<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Graduate School of Library and Information Science</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/150</link>
<description/>
<item>
<title>Participatory Transformations</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14200</link>
<description>Participatory Transformations

Haythornthwaite, Caroline A.

Learning, in its many forms, from the classroom to independent study, is being transformed by new practices emerging around Internet use. Conversation, participation and community have become watchwords for the processes of learning promised by the Internet and accomplished via technologies such as bulletin boards, wikis, blogs, social software and repositories, devices such as laptops, cell phones and digital cameras, and infrastructures of internet connection, telephone, wireless and broadband. This chapter discusses the impact of emergent, participatory trends on education. In learning and teaching participatory trends harbinge a radical transformation in who learns from whom, where, under what circumstances, and for what and whose purpose. They bring changes in where we find information, who we learn from, how learning progresses, and how we contribute to our learning and the learning of others. These trends indicate a transformation to "ubiquitous learning" – a continuous anytime, anywhere, anyone contribution and retrieval of learning materials and advice on and through the Internet and its technologies, niches and social spaces.

learning

online learning

peer production

Internet

information

</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Online Knowledge Crowds and Communities</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14198</link>
<description>Online Knowledge Crowds and Communities

Haythornthwaite, Caroline A.

While much has been written about virtual knowledge communities, particularly in how to create and sustain long-term, strong-tie relationships, the connection has not been made to newer forms of online organizing such as crowdsourcing. This paper addresses the way knowledge collectives are organized online, considering the organizational and motivational structures that support these new knowledge collectives, and contrasting the social mechanisms that support crowdsourced knowledge from those that support community-based knowledge. Examination of the literature and cases of crowds and virtual communities suggest a number of important dimensions that distinguish these two forms of organizing,  including contribution type and size, personal coorientation and commitment to the knowledge topic, interpersonal ties among contributors, authority and control of contributory practices, and recognition and reward systems. Exploring these different models of organizing knowledge provides insight into the ways to establish and maintain crowd- and community-based knowledge collectives, and also show why strong knowledge communities such as those found in academia come to change their knowledge distribution practices, notably from print to online publication.

knowledge communities

online community

crowdsourcing

</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pauline Atherton Cochrane: Selected Publications</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14100</link>
<description>Pauline Atherton Cochrane: Selected Publications

La Barre, Kathryn Anne

This is a comprehensive listing of publications by Pauline Atherton Cochrane prepared for a forthcoming article: Pauline Atherton Cochrane: Weaving Value from the Past. Libraries and the Cultural Record Volume 44, Issue 4 (Spring 2010).&#13;
&#13;
Abstract: This paper explores the contributions of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Actively engaged in research and teaching in the field of Library and Information Science (LIS) for over fifty years, Cochrane remains one of the most highly cited authors in LIS. She offered particularly deep analysis of the fundamental problems of evaluation and testing of early document retrieval systems and subject analysis tools. &#13;
&#13;
The editor, David Gracy, recommended that an excerpted version of this list be published in the article, with the full list made available elsewhere. Thus I have selected IDEALS as a suitable repository. I have also deposited a copy of this bibliography with the Syracuse University Archives, which holds the Pauline Cochrane papers as Record Group [13] Accession numbers [1038, 1042, 1234, and 3048].

Bibliography of Pauline Atherton Cochrane, Subject Access, Controlled Vocabulary

</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Youth Community Informatics Modular Posters</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14006</link>
<description>Youth Community Informatics Modular Posters

Kowalski, Chera

Ritzo, Christopher

Serbanuta, Claudia

Youth Community Informatics

</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ECHO DEPository Technical Architecture Phase 1 Final Report</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14005</link>
<description>ECHO DEPository Technical Architecture Phase 1 Final Report

Sandore, Beth

Unsworth, John

Eke, Janet

Hswe, Patricia

The ECHO DEPository (Phase 1) is an NDIIPP-partner research and development project at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) in partnership with OCLC, the National Center for Supercomputing Applications); the Michigan State University Library; and an alliance of state libraries from Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, North Carolina and Wisconsin. Our aim is to support the digital preservation efforts of the Library of Congress by addressing issues of how we collect, manage, preserve, and make useful the enormous amount of digital information our culture is now producing.  &#13;
&#13;
Phase 1 project activities (Fall 2004 through 2007) included developing web archiving tools, evaluating existing repository software, developing an architecture to enhance existing repositories’ interoperability and preservation features, and modeling next-generation repositories for supporting long-term preservation.&#13;
This narrative report describes project activities and deliverables during ECHO DEP Phase 1.

digital preservation, digital preservation infrastructure, web archiving, repository interoperability, semantic preservation

</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Professionalizing library education, the California connection: James Gillis, Everett Perry, and Joseph Daniels</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/13710</link>
<description>Professionalizing library education, the California connection: James Gillis, Everett Perry, and Joseph Daniels

Hansen, Debra Gold

Library science --History

Information science --History

</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2004 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Index to Library Trends Volume 57</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/13666</link>
<description>Index to Library Trends Volume 57

Index

</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Metadata Librarians Today: Roles and Competencies</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/13624</link>
<description>Metadata Librarians Today: Roles and Competencies

Han, Myung-Ja

Hswe, Patricia

The title of Metadata Librarian first appeared in the late 1990's in conjunction with developments in information technology and digital library initiatives. Since the title is a relatively new one, the responsibilities and competencies of the position have yet to be clearly defined. This study examined 86 job descriptions for metadata librarian positions and 83 job descriptions for cataloging librarian positions, all posted from 2000 to 2008. The authors focused on three properties common to most of the job descriptions: education, required qualifications, and desired qualifications.

metadata librarians

cataloging librarians

</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Evaluation Strategy for NSDL</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/13619</link>
<description>Evaluation Strategy for NSDL

Bruce, Bertram C.

The overarching question for the NSDL evaluation should be, "How does this online network of learning environments and resources support education?" Implied within that question are crucial ones about the NSDL as a defined technology, such as "How are people using it? How well do the mechanisms of acquisition, classification, access, and retrieval work? What is the quality of the resources?" as well as questions about the construction process, such as "How are the collections and tools changing? How  well  does  the  distributed  development process work?"

Evaluation research

Digital libraries

Science education

Situated evaluation

</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Community Inquiry and Collaborative Practice: The iLabs of Paseo Boricua</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/13618</link>
<description>Community Inquiry and Collaborative Practice: The iLabs of Paseo Boricua

Bishop, Ann Peterson

Bruce, Bertram C.

Many studies of human-computer interaction focus on environments that are fairly fixed and well-defined. These, however, leave many questions unanswered for the field of community informatics, which aims to understand how information and communication technologies (ICTs) are employed to help communities achieve their goals. In this paper, we describe and discuss the development of the iLab software and its integration with the philosophy and practice of community inquiry, by presenting our collaborative work with Chicago s Paseo Boricua neighborhood. Questions we address include: 1) What role does human-computer interaction have in the overall collaborative practices of Paseo Boricua? 2) How does the work with Paseo Boricua inform the development of ICTs for collaboration? 3) How does community inquiry theory help us to understand these processes and practices?

Paseo Boricua

Community inquiry

Community Inquiry Labs

community informatics

ICTs for collaboration

</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
