| Abstract: |
Both the writing and the reviewing of children's and young adult
nonfiction are art forms. Fine works of nonfiction promise hours of
pleasure, exhilaration, and contemplation for their readers; they convey
both wonder and passion about a particular topic or theme; and, to
paraphrase Robert Probst (1986), they feed a child's thinking rather
than control it. At best, nonfiction books are characterized by beautifully
written prose, definable themes, unifying structure, and stimulating
subjects.
Likewise, so are fine reviews. They don't simply indicate a thumbs
up/thumbs down recommendation, but instead impart a sense of the
book as a whole, discuss what subject is covered as well as how it is
presented, and suggest ways to extend a book and thus bring it to more
readers. Reviews not only introduce specific titles to librarians, teachers,
parents, and booksellers, who in turn share them with young people,
but they also feed the profession's thinking about matters concerning
the nature of literature.
Not surprisingly, the best reviewers are readers readers who devour
books rather than simply pick them up to satisfy the demands of their
jobs; readers who surround themselves with books, and words, and ideas;
and readers who want to share these passions with others. Frequently,
though, their literary love affairs begin with the traditional triumvirate
of fiction, poetry, and drama, and it is that particular genre orientation
that unconsciously affects the ways in which they interact with all
subsequent books they encounter. |