Files in this item

FilesDescriptionFormat

application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document

application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentHuang_Shaw_Lin_Poster.docx (281kB)
(no description provided)Microsoft Word 2007

Description

Title:Comparing the cited subjects and author affiliations of MIS and LIS from a research evaluation perspective
Author(s):Huang, Mu-hsuan; Shaw, Wang-Ching; Lin, Chi-Shiou
Subject(s):Journal citation report (JCR)
Research evaluation
Library and information science
Abstract:The Information Science & Library Science (IS-LS) category in Journal Citation Report (JCR) has been criticized for its collocation of library and information science (LIS) and management information systems (MIS) within one single category, which has resulted in numerous research evaluation problems. In this poster, we present an analysis based on four leading journals, one representing MIS and three representing LIS. Papers and citation data of the journals between 2005 and 2014 were analyzed to reveal the similarities and differences in the distributions of cited subjects and author affiliations of the four journals. The results show observable differences among the subject fields and the possible negative consequences of the inappropriate collocation was discussed for future research evaluation and development.
Issue Date:2019-03-15
Publisher:iSchools
Series/Report:iConference 2019 Proceedings
Genre:Conference Poster
Type:Text
Language:English
URI:http://hdl.handle.net/2142/103323
DOI:https://doi.org/10.21900/iconf.2019.103323
Rights Information:Copyright 2019 Mu-hsuan Huang, Wang-Ching Shaw, and Chi-Shiou Lin
Date Available in IDEALS:2019-03-22


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Item Statistics