Files in this item

FilesDescriptionFormat

application/pdf

application/pdfpaper_17.pdf (825kB)
(no description provided)PDF

Description

Title:Racism and Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching
Author(s):Colón-Aguirre, Mónica; Cooke, Nicole A.; Gibson, Amelia
Subject(s):Student evaluations of teaching
Bias
Discrimination
Library and information science education
Faculty of color
Abstract:Student evaluations of teaching (SET), also known as student course evaluations, are a generally accepted ways to evaluate performance of faculty members in higher education. These evaluations are tied to retention, compensation, promotion, and even hiring. However, there is a strong body of literature demonstrating that SET are highly flawed systems and that basing personnel decisions on them can lead to discriminatory employment practices. Some issues that arise with this reliance on student evaluations of teaching include the so-called reciprocity effect in which students tend to use course evaluations as a punitive action for receiving a lower grade. Other issues include the tendency to put total responsibility for the quality of the education on instructors and grade inflation. Research has also found that student evaluations of teaching are marred with sexist comments, they tend to judge racial minorities more harshly than whites, and they express more negative performance evaluations of faculty when diversity and inclusion topics are the focus of the courses being evaluated. This panel will draw upon the expertise and personal narratives of a group of faculty members who will present their experiences, points of view, and musings regarding the topic of bias in student evaluations. The main goal of this panel is to highlight issues faculty face in LIS education while analyzing the role of SETs in terms of their utility and dangers. Panelist presentations will form a good starting point for ongoing conversations regarding appropriate teaching evaluation tools which are fairer and more objective in evaluating real teaching proficiency rather than lingering on the personal biases of the evaluators.
Issue Date:2020-10-13
Series/Report:Students
Education Programs/Schools
Pedagogy
Administration
Genre:Conference Paper / Presentation
Type:Text
URI:http://hdl.handle.net/2142/108788
Date Available in IDEALS:2020-10-09


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Item Statistics