Files in this item
| Files | Description | Format |
|---|---|---|
|
application/pdf  SSRN-id2296033.pdf (97kB) | (no description provided) |
Description
| Title: | And How: Mayo v. Prometheus and the Method of Invention |
| Author(s): | Sherkow, Jacob S. |
| Subject(s): | patent
mayo prometheus invention innovation pto intellectual property |
| Abstract: | The Mayo Court's novel test for patent eligibility — whether or not an invention involves “well-understood, routine, conventional activity, previously engaged in by researchers in the field” — focuses on how an invention is accomplished rather than what an invention is. That concern with the method of invention poses several normative, statutory, and administrative difficulties. Taken seriously, the “how” requirement will likely have broad effects across all levels of patent practice. |
| Issue Date: | 2013-04-01 |
| Publisher: | Yale Law Journal |
| Citation Info: | Jacob S. Sherkow, And How: Mayo v. Prometheus and the Method of Invention, 122 Yale L.J. Online 351 (2013) |
| Genre: | Article |
| Type: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2142/110302 |
| Date Available in IDEALS: | 2021-08-11 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Illinois Research and Scholarship (Open Collection)
This is the default collection for all research and scholarship developed by faculty, staff, or students at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign