IDEALS Home University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo The Alma Mater The Main Quad

Employment adjustment in steel industry: The U.S. and Japan compared

Show full item record

Bookmark or cite this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20594

Files in this item

File Description Format
PDF 9305648.pdf (8MB) Restricted to U of Illinois (no description provided) PDF
Title: Employment adjustment in steel industry: The U.S. and Japan compared
Author(s): Park, Ho Hwan
Doctoral Committee Chair(s): Taira, Koji
Department / Program: Labor and Employment Relations
Discipline: Labor and Employment Relations
Degree Granting Institution: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree: Ph.D.
Genre: Dissertation
Subject(s): Business Administration, Management Economics, Labor Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations
Abstract: This study purports to compare employment adjustment process in steel industry between the U.S. and Japan in the period 1974-1988. In response to production decline after the Oil Shock of 1973, Japanese steel companies reduced working hours, but not employment. In the 1980s, however, they adopted a new policy: reduction of both employment and working hours. U.S. steel companies reduced both employment and working hours in the 1970s. They changed their adjustment policy in the mid-1980s: reduction of employment and an increase in working hours.This study presents industry-level and firm-level data and analyses. Using the theories of internal labor market (ILM) and strategic congruency, it explains international differences and changes overtime in employment adjustment policies and practices. First, ILM theory argues that ILM structure affects the use and extent of employment adjustment measures such as layoffs. Both Japanese and U.S. steel companies use hiring freeze and early retirement. A sharp contrast is that Japanese companies frequently transfer redundant workers within and between firms, whereas U.S. companies readily lay them off.Second, the congruency of transfer with promotion and compensation is examined. In Japanese steel industry, transfers do not hurt the promotion and compensation of transferred workers. In the U.S., at least inter-plant transfers adversely affect these terms of employment due to seniority rules limited to one plant. This incongruency of transfer, promotion, and compensation in U.S. steel industry discourages the inter-plant transfer of redundant workers and increases layoffs. In conclusion, the employment adjustment of Japanese steel companies appears more concerned for employment security than that of U.S. companies.
Issue Date: 1992
Type: Text
Language: English
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20594
Rights Information: Copyright 1992 Park, Ho Hwan
Date Available in IDEALS: 2011-05-07
Identifier in Online Catalog: AAI9305648
OCLC Identifier: (UMI)AAI9305648
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Item Statistics

  • Total Downloads: 1
  • Downloads this Month: 0
  • Downloads Today: 0

Browse

My Account

Information

Access Key