Files in this item

FilesDescriptionFormat

application/pdf

application/pdf9236533.pdf (7MB)Restricted to U of Illinois
(no description provided)PDF

Description

Title:Finding the commonalities: The role of analogical mapping during similarity judgments
Author(s):Markman, Arthur Brian
Doctoral Committee Chair(s):Gentner, Dedre
Department / Program:Psychology
Discipline:Psychology
Degree Granting Institution:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree:Ph.D.
Genre:Dissertation
Subject(s):Psychology, Experimental
Abstract:Similarity plays a central role in cognitive theories. Much research has been devoted to understanding what makes a pair of objects similar. This research has demonstrated that the similarity of a pair increases with its commonalities and decreases with its differences. These common and distinctive elements can take the form of parts of objects, relations between parts or properties of whole objects. However, previous work has been unable to reconcile this variety of information within a single framework. We suggest that structural alignment, like that proposed to mediate analogical reasoning, provides a sufficiently powerful process for determining the commonalities and differences of complex representations. In order to make this suggestion more concrete, we present two simulations of the similarity comparison process using the Structure Mapping Engine (Falkenhainer, Forbus and Gentner, 1989), a computer implementation of Gentner's (1983) structure-mapping theory of analogy. The simulations indicate that salient object commonalities yield a preference for mappings based on object similarities, while salient relational commonalities yield a preference for mappings based on relational similarities. We test these predictions in five experiments using the one-shot mapping technique which places local and global similarities in opposition. The results support the general conjecture that similarity comparisons involve structural alignment, as well as the more detailed predictions derived from the simulations. These results pose a difficulty for models using representations that do not encode the binding between relations and their arguments.
Issue Date:1992
Type:Text
Language:English
URI:http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21275
Rights Information:Copyright 1992 Markman, Arthur Brian
Date Available in IDEALS:2011-05-07
Identifier in Online Catalog:AAI9236533
OCLC Identifier:(UMI)AAI9236533


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Item Statistics