IDEALS Home University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo The Alma Mater The Main Quad

Battered woman syndrome: Juror common understanding and expert testimony

Show full item record

Bookmark or cite this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21811

Files in this item

File Description Format
PDF 9702608.pdf (12MB) Restricted to U of Illinois (no description provided) PDF
Title: Battered woman syndrome: Juror common understanding and expert testimony
Author(s): Mechanic, Mindy Beth
Doctoral Committee Chair(s): Aber, Mark S.
Department / Program: Psychology
Discipline: Psychology
Degree Granting Institution: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree: Ph.D.
Genre: Dissertation
Subject(s): Law Psychology, Social Social Work Women's Studies Psychology, Clinical
Abstract: The purpose of the present research was to address two broad questions related to the use of expert testimony in battered women's homicide cases. First, what do laypersons know about battering, and in what ways is that knowledge tied to conceptually similar attitudinal constructs, such as sex roles, adversarial beliefs about women, and support for the use of violence against women? Second, what is the impact of expert testimony on juror decision-making in a simulated battered woman's homicide case? Do prior knowledge of domestic violence and beliefs about the acceptability of woman-battering affect receptivity to expert testimony or influence the decision-making process?Results from the first study provide preliminary psychometric support for the development of a measure to assess lay knowledge of battering. Using the known groups method, initial evidence of validity was demonstrated. The measure was found to have adequate reliability. Evidence of discriminant validity was obtained by showing the measure to be only marginally associated with related attitudinal and sex role constructs. Substantive findings suggest that while there is a subset of information about battering that is common knowledge, and an equally small domain of misinformation, there is inconsistency in knowledge about the majority of information.Results from study two emphasize the limited impact of expert testimony on juror decision-making in a battered women's homicide case. Long standing individual difference factors were influential in shaping the decision-making process, and the verdicts rendered. In addition, findings underscore confusion between constructs related to excuse vs. justification in battered women's homicide cases.
Issue Date: 1996
Type: Text
Language: English
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21811
ISBN: 9780591089042
Rights Information: Copyright 1996 Mechanic, Mindy Beth
Date Available in IDEALS: 2011-05-07
Identifier in Online Catalog: AAI9702608
OCLC Identifier: (UMI)AAI9702608
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Item Statistics

  • Total Downloads: 1
  • Downloads this Month: 0
  • Downloads Today: 0

Browse

My Account

Information

Access Key