Files in this item

FilesDescriptionFormat

application/pdf

application/pdf108_ready.pdf (534kB)
PDF

application/octet-stream

application/octet-stream108.epub (1MB)
Unknown

application/octet-stream

application/octet-stream108.mobi (375kB)
Unknown

Description

Title:How `Social' are Social News Sites? Exploring the Motivations for Using Reddit.com
Author(s):Bogers, Toine; Wernersen, Rasmus
Subject(s):social news; motivation; social media; ReddIt; user participation
Abstract:Social news sites allow their users to submit and vote on online news stories, thereby bypassing the authority and power of traditional newspaper editors. In this paper we explore what motivates users of social news sites, such as Reddit, to participate in this collaborative editorial process. We present a tiered framework of motivational factors for participating on social news sites, based on a comprehensive literature review, drawn from fields like social media research, sociology, (social) psychology, and behavioral economics. We then validate this framework through a survey deployed on Reddit and use the results of this survey to focus the motivational framework for the social news domain. the recreational value of the information posted to Reddit, along with the powerful possibilities for customization appear to be the most powerful incentives for using Reddit. Perhaps surprisingly, the social aspect of social news sites is not a motivating factor for the majority of Reddit users. Influencing the placement and reception of news stories in their niche communities of interest is what draws people to sites such as Reddit.
Issue Date:2014-03-01
Publisher:iSchools
Citation Info:Bogers, T., & Wernersen, R. (2014). How "Social" are Social News Sites? Exploring the Motivations for Using Reddit.com. In iConference 2014 Proceedings (p. 329 - 344). doi:10.9776/14108
Series/Report:iConference 2014 Proceedings
Genre:Conference Paper / Presentation
Type:Text
Language:english
URI:http://hdl.handle.net/2142/47295
DOI:10.9776/14108
Other Identifier(s):108
Publication Status:published
Peer Reviewed:yes
Rights Information:Copyright 2014 is held by the authors of individual items in the proceedings. Copyright permissions, when appropriate, must be obtained directly from the authors.
Date Available in IDEALS:2014-02-28


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Item Statistics