Files in this item



application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheetAnalyzed_Data(IDEALS_Archived).xlsx (172kB)
DataMicrosoft Excel 2007


application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentMethods.docx (21kB)
MethodsMicrosoft Word 2007


Title:A Novel Foraging Threshold and Effects of Application on Energetic Carrying Capacity for Waterfowl
Author(s):Hagy, Heath Michael
conservation planning
Geographic Coverage:Mississippi Alluvial Valley
Abstract:Energetic carrying capacity of habitats for wildlife is a fundamental concept used to better understand population ecology and prioritize conservation efforts. However, carrying capacity can be difficult to estimate accurately and simplified models often depend on many assumptions and few estimated parameters. We demonstrate the complex nature of parameterizing energetic carrying capacity models and use an experimental approach to describe a necessary parameter, a foraging threshold (i.e., density of food at which animals no longer can efficiently forage and acquire energy), for a guild of migratory birds. We created foraging patches with different fixed prey densities and monitored the numerical and functional responses of waterfowl (Anatidae) and depletion of foods during winter. Dabbling ducks (Anatini) fed extensively in plots and all initial densities of supplemented seed were rapidly reduced to 10 kg/ha and other natural seeds and tubers combined to 170 kg/ha, despite different starting densities. However, ducks did not abandon or stop foraging in wetlands when seed reduction ceased about two weeks into the winter-long experiment, nor did they consistently distribute according to ideal-free predictions during this period. Dabbling duck use of experimental plots was not related to initial seed density, and residual seed and tuber densities varied among plant taxa and wetlands but not plots. Dabbling ducks did not cease foraging after they apparently reached a food availability threshold, where seed densities apparently were too low to exploit despite continued foraging effort. Herein, we reached several conclusions: 1) foraging effort and numerical responses of dabbling ducks in winter were likely influenced by factors other than total food densities (e.g., predation risk, opportunity costs, forager condition), 2) foraging thresholds may vary among foraging locations, and 3) the numerical response of dabbling ducks may be an inconsistent predictor of habitat quality relative to seed and tuber abundance. We describe implications of using different foraging thresholds in energetic carrying capacity models and suggest scientists reevaluate assumptions of these models used to guide habitat conservation.
Issue Date:2014
Citation Info:Hagy, H.M., and R.M. Kaminski. 2014. A Novel Foraging Threshold and Effects of Application on Energetic Carrying Capacity for Waterfowl.
Type:Dataset / Spreadsheet
Sponsor:Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheris and Parks
Date Available in IDEALS:2014-08-14

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Item Statistics