Files in this item



application/pdfRichael_Young.pdf (10MB)
(no description provided)PDF


Title:Tradable permit systems for a spatially heterogeneous externality: A microparameter approach
Author(s):Young, Richael
Advisor(s):Brozović, Nicholas
Department / Program:Agr & Consumer Economics
Discipline:Agricultural & Applied Econ
Degree Granting Institution:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Subject(s):Groundwater management
environmental markets
tradable permits
environmental economics
Abstract:The reduction of surface water flows by adjacent groundwater pumping is an externality caused by agricultural producers. Previous studies have analyzed management policies for such externalities, but these have assumed that the ability to monitor stream depletion is perfect and the ability to regulate it is continuous. In practice, the ability to monitor either stream depletion or groundwater pumping is limited as it is often politically or financially infeasible to do so. Consequently, real-world management strategies result in reductions in farm size rather than in groundwater pumping, an adjustment at the extensive rather than the intensive margin. To reflect real-world conditions, I consider alternative policies when the ability to monitor is imperfect. The purpose of this analysis is to understand the relative performance of tax, zoning, and trading policies to meet reductions in stream depletion in terms of aggregate costs and changes in industry size. To accomplish this, I develop a microparameter model that considers policies based on easily observable field characteristics, and make a methodological contribution by introducing tradable permit systems into the microparameter framework. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, I derive general results regarding aggregate abatement, industry size, and costs. I then apply this model to a specific case study of a resource district in western Nebraska. Results show that the welfare loss of imperfect monitoring of groundwater pumping may be small. The relative cost-savings of alternative policies depend largely on the joint distribution of field profitability and marginal damage, but the ranking of policies in terms of cost-effectiveness is fairly robust.
Issue Date:2014-09-16
Rights Information:Copyright 2014 Richael Kentlee Young
Date Available in IDEALS:2014-09-16
Date Deposited:2014-08

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Item Statistics