- IDEALS Home
- →
- iSchools
- →
- iConferences
- →
- iConference 2015
- →
- iConference 2015 Poster Descriptions
- →
- View Item
Files in this item
Files | Description | Format |
---|---|---|
application/pdf ![]() | (no description provided) |
Description
Title: | Disciplinary Difference in Citation Opinion Expressions |
Author(s): | Yu, Bei; Zhang, Feifei |
Subject(s): | informetrics and scholarly communication
natural language processing text/data/knowledge mining |
Abstract: | This study examines academic opinion expressions in citation context. We first developed an annotation schema to annotate three aspects of each academic opinion expressed in a citation statement: rhetorical purpose, content aspect, and opinion polarity. We then annotated two samples: a natural science sample consisting of biomedical journal articles, and an engineering sample consisting of conference papers in the natural language processing field. A comparison of the annotations on the two samples showed disciplinary differences in citation opinion expressions. The result contributes to the understanding of academic opinion expressions in citation context and the development of automated citation opinion analysis tools to assist researchers' literature search and navigation. |
Issue Date: | 2015-03-15 |
Publisher: | iSchools |
Series/Report: | iConference 2015 Proceedings |
Genre: | Conference Poster |
Type: | Text |
Language: | English |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2142/73750 |
Peer Reviewed: | yes |
Rights Information: | Copyright 2015 is held by the authors. Copyright permissions, when appropriate, must be obtained directly from the authors. |
Date Available in IDEALS: | 2015-03-24 |