Files in this item

FilesDescriptionFormat

application/pdf

application/pdf9989979.pdf (9MB)Restricted to U of Illinois
(no description provided)PDF

Description

Title:Eidos and Facticity in Husserl's Phenomenology of Judgment
Author(s):Dickens, William Allen, Jr
Doctoral Committee Chair(s):Melnick, Arthur
Department / Program:Philosophy
Discipline:Philosophy
Degree Granting Institution:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree:Ph.D.
Genre:Dissertation
Subject(s):Philosophy
Abstract:The study concludes that Husserl's attempt, as well as Heidegger's, falls short. Husserl's fails because in both his "static" and "genetic" analyses of judgment he is compelled to cite an irremediably factical element as a transcendental explanatory factor, "pure matter" in the former case and the "absolute now" in the latter. Heidegger's account fails insofar as: (1) he accounts for the satisfaction of objectively warranted judgment's general necessary conditions in Dasein's Being in what amount to a priori, eidetic terms; and (2) he makes a necessary condition an irremediably non-eidetic factor, namely Dasein's pre-understanding of Being's general meaning. Despite their outward differences, then, both Husserl's and Heidegger's phenomenologies in their analyses of judgment fail for the ways in which eidos and facticity become related to one another.
Issue Date:2000
Type:Text
Language:English
Description:138 p.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2000.
URI:http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87614
Other Identifier(s):(MiAaPQ)AAI9989979
Date Available in IDEALS:2015-09-28
Date Deposited:2000


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Item Statistics