Files in this item



application/pdfSa576.pdf (347kB)
(no description provided)PDF


application/octet-streamSa576.epub (351kB)
(no description provided)Unknown


Title:Distribution of user-perceived usefulness of four presentation styles of opinion summarization
Author(s):Sa, Ning; Yuan, Xiaojun; Begany, Grace; Yang, Huahai
Subject(s):opinion summarization
presentation styles
Abstract:In this study, four opinion summarization styles were compared under an experimental environment. Thirty four participants sorted thirty two cards into five usefulness categories. Every eight cards belong to one presentation style. It was found that the users spent the shortest time on cards in “not at all useful” category. The time of viewing “extremely useful” cards was also shorter than that of “somewhat useful”, “useful”, and “very useful” cards. This result can be explained with the components of the usefulness categories. Tag clouds and Aspect oriented sentiments needed less time to view. They are the major styles in “not at all useful” and “extremely useful”. Paragraph summaries and Group samples requested more time and they took at least 50% in “somewhat useful”, “useful”, and “very useful”. The findings are consistent with our previous results.
Issue Date:2016-03-15
Citation Info:NA
Series/Report:IConference 2016 Proceedings
Genre:Conference Poster
Rights Information:Copyright 2016 is held by the authors. Copyright permissions, when appropriate, must be obtained directly from the authors.
Date Available in IDEALS:2016-03-08

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Item Statistics