Files in this item

FilesDescriptionFormat

application/pdf

application/pdf1.25_369_Zhang- ... sh scientific journals.pdf (6MB)
(no description provided)PDF

Description

Title:Is Google Scholar useful for the evaluation of non-English scientific journals? The case of Chinese journals
Author(s):Zhang, Yang; Lun, Huilian; Yang, Zhejun
Subject(s):Google Scholar
Journal evaluation
Non-English journals
Citation analysis
Scientometrics
Abstract:This study aims to explore how useful Google Scholar is for the evaluation of non-English journals with the case of Chinese journals. Based on a sample of 150 Chinese journals across two disciplines, it provides a comparison between Google Scholar and Chongqing VIP, which is an important Chinese citation database, from three aspects: resource coverage, journal ranking and citation data. Results indicate that Google Scholar is equipped with sufficient resources and citation data for the evaluation of Chinese journals. However, the Chinese journal ranking reported by Google Scholar Metrics is not developed enough. But Google Scholar is able to be an alternative source of citation data instead of Chinese citation databases. The Average Citation is a useful metric in the evaluation of Chinese journals with data from Google Scholar to provide a comprehensive reflection of journals’ impact. Overall, Google Scholar is useful and worthy of attention when evaluating Chinese journals.
Issue Date:2017
Publisher:iSchools
Citation Info:Zhang, Y., Lun, H., & Yang, Z. (2017). Is Google Scholar Useful for the Evaluation of Non-English Scientific Journals? The Case of Chinese Journals. In iConference 2017 Proceedings (pp. 241–261). https://doi.org/10.9776/17025
Series/Report:iConference 2017 Proceedings
Genre:Conference Paper/Presentation
Type:Text
Language:English
URI:http://hdl.handle.net/2142/96676
DOI:https://doi.org/10.9776/17025
Rights Information:Copyright 2017 Yang Zhang, Huilian Lun, and Zhejun Yang
Date Available in IDEALS:2017-07-27


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Item Statistics