<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-21T05:03:34Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/101131" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/101131</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-07-11</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_8888</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_8887</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_234</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:contributor>Ahuja, Narendra</dc:contributor>
          <dc:creator>Li, Xing</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2018-09-04T20:33:55Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2018-09-04T20:33:55Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2020-09-05T09:15:09Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2018-03-27</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2018-05</dc:date>
          <dc:description>Corn kernel quality evaluation is a trivial task for experienced farmers and agriculture researchers, but it becomes tricky if we try to develop a computer vision based automatic solution.  In this thesis, we present two approaches for this problem,  briefly introduce the data sets corresponding to each method and compare the accuracy between them.  We attack the corn kernel quality evaluation problem by two different methods:  (1) Evaluate the quality based  on  the  percentage  of  good  corn  kernels  within  the  scope  by  a  “percentage” classifier trained with multi-class support vector machine (SVM).(2) Evaluate the quality by a good corn kernel detector trained with multiple state-of-the-art detectors, specifically Faster R-CNN and Retinanet.  We collected  two  databases  for  both  methods  separately:  (1)  Images  of  many corn kernel batches containing different percentages of good corn kernels vs.foreign matter randomly placed on a flat surface were taken as both training and  testing  data  for  multi-class  SVM.  (2)  Reuse  the  images  taken  for  the SVM  data set  and  add  bounding  box  annotations  to  each  image  following the Microsoft COCO fashion.  Our experiments show that multi-class SVM reaches a rank-1 accuracy of 78%, while the deep learning detectors achieved96%  precision.   While  the  multi-class  SVM  approach  shows  good  classification results, deep learning models provide more precise detection results.Unfortunately, previous works are all based on lab environments and there is no benchmark available in this field.  Therefore, we consider our work as a baseline for corn kernel quality evaluation.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2020-05-01</dc:description>
          <dc:description>The student, Xing Li, accepted the attached license on 2018-03-26 at 16:23.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>The student, Xing Li, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2018-03-26 at 16:41.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>This Thesis was approved for publication on 2018-03-27 at 09:24.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #12089 on 2018-08-31 at 17:17:43</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-04T20:33:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
LI-THESIS-2018.pdf: 50717914 bytes, checksum: ecc079e8e3693c2b7ee7859ffc14a8e0 (MD5)
LICENSE.txt: 4204 bytes, checksum: fd1bf3ed2e556496cfe6b7f962cc2f07 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2018-03-27</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 107214
Lift date: 2020-09-04T20:34:13Z
Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 107214
Lift date: 2020-09-04T20:37:00Z
Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 107214
Lift date: 2020-09-04T20:42:08Z
Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system</dc:description>
          <dc:description>U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 107214 on 2020-09-05T09:15:09Z.</dc:description>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101131</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>Copyright 2018 Xing Li</dc:rights>
          <dc:subject>Computer Vision, Corn Kernel Quality, Machine Learning, Fast R-CNN, RPN, Faster R-CNN, FPN, Retinanet.</dc:subject>
          <dc:title>Computer vision based corn kernel quality evaluation: Traditional versus machine learning</dc:title>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <degree>
            <department>Electrical &amp; Computer Eng</department>
            <discipline>Electrical Engineering</discipline>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <level>Thesis</level>
            <name>M.S.</name>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
