<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-23T16:54:30Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/120591" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/120591</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-09-07</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_11614</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_11613</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_8903</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:contributor>Fairbairn, Catharine E.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:date>2023-05</dc:date>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <dc:description>Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2025-05-01</dc:description>
          <dc:description>The student, Yang Lu, accepted the attached license on 2023-05-04 at 09:28.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>The student, Yang Lu, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2023-05-04 at 09:43.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>This Thesis was approved for publication on 2023-05-04 at 16:36.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #19331 on 2023-09-01 at 17:22:23</dc:description>
          <dc:title>Effects of repeated breathalyzer use on BAC level and self-estimation accuracy</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Lu, Yang</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2023-05-04</dc:date>
          <dc:subject>Alcohol</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Aud</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Self-monitoring</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Bac</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Self-awareness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Intoxication</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Breathalyzer</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Alcohol is a leading contributor to death and a major risk factor for illness. Lifetime prevalence of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (AUD) in the United States is 29.1%, with only 19.8% ever receiving treatment (Grant et al., 2015). AUD treatments often involve self-monitoring of alcohol use and improving awareness of intoxication. With the popularization of mobile health solutions, consumer-grade breathalyzers can be a useful, accessible tool for objectively self-monitoring blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and training people to accurately self-assess their intoxication. The current study analyzes nationwide proprietary breathalyzer data across a six-year period to investigate whether breathalyzer usage (Repeated Use) and the time elapsed since first breathalyzer use (Time) led to changes in BAC level and BAC self-estimation accuracy. The effects of BAC feedback on BAC level were examined in a sample of 1,450,151 observations. A subsample of 385,945 observations was used for BAC self-estimation accuracy models. In the mixed effects multilevel model with Repeated Use and Time as covariates, both led to an increase in BAC level; Repeated Use, b = 0.00032, t = 31.78, p &lt; 0.0001; Time, b = 0.00001, t = 10.41, p &lt; 0.0001. In the set of models examining how, as covariates, Repeated Use and Time affect BAC self-estimation accuracy, Repeated Use increased this accuracy (Absolute Difference, b = -0.00051, ERR = 0.99949 t = -3.99, p &lt; 0.0001; Percentage Difference, b = -0.04647, t = -11.43, p &lt; 0.0001), while Time decreased accuracy (Absolute Difference, b = 0.00008, ERR = 1.00008, t = 7.50, p &lt; 0.0001; Percentage Difference, b = 0.00221, t = 6.96, p &lt; 0.0001). Results point to complex outcomes linked with repeated BAC monitoring, indicating potential mixed utility for BAC self-monitoring interventions delivered in isolation. Future research might explore individual differences in effects of BAC monitoring, as well as person-level associations between BAC level and self-estimation accuracy.</dc:description>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/2142/120591</dc:identifier>
          <dc:rights>Copyright 2023 Yang Lu</dc:rights>
          <degree>
            <name>M.S.</name>
            <level>Thesis</level>
            <discipline>Psychology</discipline>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <department>Psychology</department>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
