<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-20T09:55:16Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/14595" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/14595</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-07-10</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_8800</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5132</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:description>Made available in DSpace on 2010-01-06T16:13:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 6
license.txt: 4058 bytes, checksum: 93505d78b7cefa5fd8c83e7ae87e155c (MD5)
George-Jackson_Casey.doc: 1987072 bytes, checksum: 90c133ff4f6ca7bda69d8a408266d83e (MD5)
George-Jackson_Casey.pdf: 1213558 bytes, checksum: 171393c63e109036e4dfa8a69ce1408b (MD5)
1_George-Jackson_Casey.doc: 1987072 bytes, checksum: f60ee94f08dc869135e6c4c9794cb222 (MD5)
2_George-Jackson_Casey.doc: 1987072 bytes, checksum: f60ee94f08dc869135e6c4c9794cb222 (MD5)
1_George-Jackson_Casey.pdf: 1168030 bytes, checksum: d35d612c70d02ece825848e7123e54e5 (MD5)</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Word versions of dissertation deleted at request of cgeo@illinois.edu; agreed to keep source docuement. sshreeve@illinois.edu - 1-10-2010</dc:description>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14595</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>Copyright 2009 Casey Elizabeth George-Jackson</dc:rights>
          <dc:subject>Women in STEM</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>women in science</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>minorities in STEM</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>minorities in science</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>STEM degrees</dc:subject>
          <dc:contributor>Trent, William T.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Trent, William T.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Parker, Laurence J.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Span, Christopher M.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Baber, Lorenzo D.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:creator>George-Jackson, Casey Elizabeth</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2010-01-06T16:13:37Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2010-01-06T16:13:37Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2009-12</dc:date>
          <dc:description>This study uses longitudinal data of undergraduate students from five public land-grant universities to better understand undergraduate students’ persistence in and switching of majors, with particular attention given to women’s participation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. Specifically, the study examines patterns of behavior of women and minorities in relation to initial choice of college major and major field persistence, as well as what majors students switched to upon changing majors. Factors that impact major field persistence are also examined, as well as how switching majors affects students’ time-to-degree. Using a broad definition of STEM, data from nearly 17,000 undergraduate students was analyzed with descriptive statistics, cross tabulations, and binary logistic regressions. The results highlight women’s high levels of participation and success in the sciences, challenging common notions of underrepresentation in the STEM fields. The study calls for researchers to use a comprehensive definition of STEM and broad measurements of persistence when investigating students’ participation in the STEM fields.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2009-11-27T17:43:10Z
Item was in collections:
University of Illinois Theses &amp; Dissertations (ID: 1)
No. of bitstreams: 2
George-Jackson_Casey.pdf: 1213558 bytes, checksum: 171393c63e109036e4dfa8a69ce1408b (MD5)
George-Jackson_Casey.doc: 1987072 bytes, checksum: 90c133ff4f6ca7bda69d8a408266d83e (MD5)</dc:description>
          <dc:subject>underrepresentation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>higher education</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Land-grant university</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>participation in STEM</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>undergraduate students</dc:subject>
          <dc:title>Rethinking the STEM fields: the importance of definitions in examining women's participation and success in the sciences</dc:title>
          <degree>
            <department>Educational Policy Studies</department>
            <departmentCode>1640</departmentCode>
            <discipline>Educational Policy Studies</discipline>
            <disciplineCode>0220</disciplineCode>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <level>Dissertation</level>
            <name>Ph.D.</name>
            <program>PHD:Educ Policy Studies -UIUC</program>
            <programCode>10KS0220PHD</programCode>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
