2026-09-22T10:28:57Z https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh

oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/15996 2023-07-10 col_2142_5131 col_2142_8800 com_2142_5130 com_2142_5132

Ash, Carey L. 2010-05-18T18:55:34Z 2010-05-18T18:55:34Z Anderson, James D. 2012-05-19T10:00:15Z 2018-12-06T10:15:35Z 2010-05-18T18:55:34Z Since 1896, the issue of “separate but equal” has been an ever present notion in American society. From water fountains to lunch counters, the use of public facilities and the receipt of public services have often been impacted by the ethno-racial group to which one belongs. One of the greatest examples of this circumstance can be found in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) wherein it was determined that separate public school facilities for African-American and Caucasian students were inherently unequal. Although the Supreme Court eradicated the “separate” premise of the “separate but equal” doctrine in the Brown decision, the ever elusive goal of providing equal educational opportunities to all of America’s students remains ephemeral. It is this notion of a right to equal educational opportunities that I examine through the lens of the landmark Supreme Court case San Antonio School District v. Rodriguez (1973). Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-04-29T17:49:45Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Ash_Carey.doc: 134656 bytes, checksum: dec0e65e31035621feab72b74e9bed6d (MD5) Ash_Carey.pdf: 278808 bytes, checksum: 698bebe170cc26d7316f6c8e64eb09b6 (MD5) Made available in DSpace on 2010-05-18T18:55:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Ash_Carey.doc: 134656 bytes, checksum: dec0e65e31035621feab72b74e9bed6d (MD5) Ash_Carey.pdf: 278808 bytes, checksum: 698bebe170cc26d7316f6c8e64eb09b6 (MD5) license.txt: 4055 bytes, checksum: 556aaeabc1ebe0c90a1fc040ff5ad6f1 (MD5) Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2010-05-18T18:56:42Z Item is restricted until 2012-05-18T18:56:42Z Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-05-19T10:00:15Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Dissertations and Theses (ID: 204) College of Education Dissertations and Theses (ID: 434) No. of bitstreams: 4 Ash_Carey.pdf.txt: 79312 bytes, checksum: baba7db3a41a5d4c2cebbfd997e11d03 (MD5) Ash_Carey.doc: 134656 bytes, checksum: dec0e65e31035621feab72b74e9bed6d (MD5) Ash_Carey.pdf: 278808 bytes, checksum: 698bebe170cc26d7316f6c8e64eb09b6 (MD5) license.txt: 4055 bytes, checksum: 556aaeabc1ebe0c90a1fc040ff5ad6f1 (MD5) Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-05-19T10:00:15Z U of I Only Restriction set for Item 16054 on 2016-12-06T14:33:00Z with date 2018-12-06 by kappleg2@illinois.edu. U of I Only Restriction set for Item 16054 on 2016-12-06T14:33:06Z with date 2018-12-06 by kappleg2@illinois.edu. U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 16054 on 2018-12-06T10:15:35Z. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/15996 en Copyright 2010 Carey L. Ash Education Opportunity Equal Rights Fundamental Property Liberty Due Process San Antonio Rodriguez Supreme Court The case for education as a fundamental right of citizenship in the United States 2010-5 Educational Policy Studies 1640 Educational Policy Studies 0220 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Thesis M.A. PHD:Educ Policy Studies -UIUC 10KS0220PHD