<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-18T19:34:24Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22407" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22407</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-07-10</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_8800</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5132</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:identifier>(UMI)AAI9124378</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22407</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>Copyright 1991 Armitano, Karen S.</dc:rights>
          <dc:subject>Education, Language and Literature</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Language, Linguistics</dc:subject>
          <dc:contributor>Mack, Molly</dc:contributor>
          <dc:creator>Armitano, Karen S.</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2011-05-07T13:38:51Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2011-05-07T13:38:51Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>10000-01-01</dc:date>
          <dc:date>1991</dc:date>
          <dc:description>This study was based on a reaction time (RT) experiment conducted to see if there were differences in RTs between code-mixers and non-code-mixers in a sentence verification task. Task 1 was a timed test in which Spanish-English bilingual code-mixers and non-code-mixers responded to computer-presented monolingual sentences and acceptable and unacceptable code-mixed sentences. Task 2 was a non-timed metalinguistic grammaticality judgment task in which the same subjects were asked to indicate if the code-mixed sentences presented in the timed task were acceptable or unacceptable code-mixed sentences.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Results revealed small, though not significant, RT differences between code-mixers and non-code-mixers responses to code-mixed and monolingual sentences. Results also revealed no significant difference between code-mixers and non-code-mixers' number of correct responses on the non-timed task. However, both groups' RTs to English monolingual sentences were significantly shorter than their RTs to Spanish monolingual sentences, and their RTs to acceptable code-mixed sentences were significantly shorter than their RTs to unacceptable code-mixed sentences. Also, subjects' RTs to some constraints were significantly different from their RTs to other constraints.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Such findings suggest that code-mixers and non-code-mixers may not be different types of bilinguals. In addition, the fact that subjects responded significantly faster to acceptable than to unacceptable code-mixed sentences suggests that rules for code-mixing do exist. Finally, differences in subjects' responses to various syntactic constraints suggest that some constraints on code-mixing may be stronger than others. The implications of such findings are that code-mixing appears to be rule governed and that the processing of code-mixed sentences may parallel the procesing of monolingual sentences.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:38:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5)
9124378.pdf: 6717039 bytes, checksum: 5e5ecad428f50958a7a62d09240ffc37 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 1991</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:57:24Z
Item is restricted indefinitely.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:26:55-05:00
Original Data
Group with Access UIUC Users [automated]
Release Date: none
Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission</dc:description>
          <dc:description>ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission</dc:description>
          <dc:description>U of I Only</dc:description>
          <dc:identifier>AAI9124378</dc:identifier>
          <dc:subject>Psychology, Experimental</dc:subject>
          <dc:title>Processing of code-mixed sentences by two types of bilinguals: A comparison of code-mixers and non-code-mixers</dc:title>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <degree>
            <department>Education</department>
            <discipline>Education</discipline>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <level>Dissertation</level>
            <name>Ph.D.</name>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
