2026-09-22T02:02:17Z https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh

oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22709 2023-07-10 col_2142_5131 col_2142_16319 com_2142_5130 com_2142_16318 com_2142_5126

Davis, Peter A. Mullenix, Elizabeth Reitz 2011-05-07T13:48:51Z 2011-05-07T13:48:51Z 10000-01-01 1995 Vigorous scholarly interest in gender studies, women's history and feminist theory in the 1980s and 1990s has generated a vast amount of recent material on cross-dressing. Yet, despite cross-dressing's present favor within academia, a paucity of historical analysis exists regarding perhaps the most celebrated of all theatrical transvestites: the nineteenth-century American breeches actress. Established as a popular convention during the English Restoration, the practice of breeches performance reached its peak in America during the first half of the nineteenth century as actresses donned doublets and hose, tunics and tights on a regular basis in theatres throughout the country. Regardless of the American breeches performer's ubiquitous appeal, however, many basic histories of the American theatre ignore this convention; the history that has been written about the cross-dressed actress consists largely of a discussion of her as a sexual object. "This gendered historical analysis of the convention from 1800-1869 demonstrates that breeches performance was much more than a cleverly disguised leg show. Certainly, the breeches performer was occasionally objectified by the press, yet she seldom invited such perceptions; nor were these critical observations rendered innocently. Rather, discourses of containment (of which sexual objectification was one) were instituted in order to mitigate fears of female usurpation and ""petticoat government."" In an effort to reinforce dominant gender ideology, critics repeatedly feminized, infantilized and sexualized the cross-dressed actress in a deliberate attempt to show that her disguise was translucent. Such recuperative critical strategies became necessary as more and more actresses began to assume male lines of business and threats of female revolution became increasingly palpable for the male critic. By self-consciously dissolving gender boundaries through their attempt to pass as men both on and off stage, actresses contributed to these critical anxieties. Indeed, the breeches performer, who generally thought of herself as a serious artist, often betrayed a protofeminist politic behind her male mask, and select performers were able to use their male personas to liberate themselves from the domestic sphere and to brave new territory for American women." Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:48:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9624444.pdf: 21218199 bytes, checksum: d79b3a3a9e9e97c35b4bdb81b380748d (MD5) Previous issue date: 1995 Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:59:28Z Item is restricted indefinitely. Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:28:03-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission U of I Only AAI9624444 (UMI)AAI9624444 http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22709 eng Copyright 1995 Mullenix, Elizabeth Reitz History, United States Women's Studies Theater """Fair Montague"" or ""Ill-beseeming beast"": Breeches performance on the American stage, 1800-1869" text Ph.D. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dissertation Theatre Theatre