2026-09-18T19:33:26Z https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh

oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22908 2023-07-10 col_2142_5131 col_2142_14811 com_2142_5130 com_2142_9166 com_2142_8903

10000-01-01 Bruner, Edward M. King, C. Richard 2011-05-07T13:55:29Z 2011-05-07T13:55:29Z 1996 In this dissertation, I examine the imperial structures of American culture, outline an interpretation of the changing intersection of anthropological and historical techniques of representation, while documenting prevailing uses and understandings of Native American cultures and histories within exhibitionary spaces. I advance three arguments. First, I identify a shift in the imperial structures of American culture, from the celebration, comfortable acceptance, and largely unquestioned appropriateness of conquest and colonization to the predicaments associated with living through the illegitimate, uncomfortable, and conflicted aftermath of an irreversible conquest. Importantly, I theorize this reconfiguration of colonialism and culture in the contemporary United States as the emergence of postcoloniality, a condition marked not only by the breakdown of metanarratives which position EuroAmerican history and culture as History and Culture, but also the recycling of imperial idioms which resuscitate this connection. Second, anthropological and historical practices, no less than their objects, culture and history, have been fundamental to the recoding of the imperial structures of American culture. Third, while individuals and institutions have increasingly challenged and modified the stories told about Native America, these reformulations have largely reproduced or recuperated the structures and sentiments central to previous renditions. Exhibitionary spaces continue to rely on narrative and exhibitionary practices which devalue, stereotype, and dismiss Native American cultures and histories. I present historical ethnographies of four sites to substantiate these arguments: (1) the Smithsonian Institution, (2) the invention and perpetuation of Chief Illiniwek, the athletic mascot of the University of Illinois, (3) the Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument, and (4) the exhibition of Comanche, supposedly the sole survivor of the Battle of the Little Bighorn, at the University of Kansas Natural History Museum. In conclusion, I propose four alternative sets of practice to 'decolonize' exhibitionary spaces: (1) reinvented anthropological histories, (2) repatriation, (3) revivification, and (4) reflexivity. Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:55:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9702560.pdf: 10264466 bytes, checksum: 58cc90783ddedf1c63ed9189d19ff928 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996 Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:00:51Z Item is restricted indefinitely. Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:28:49-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission U of I Only 9780591088038 AAI9702560 (UMI)AAI9702560 http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22908 eng Copyright 1996 King, C. Richard American Studies Anthropology, Cultural Imperial recollections: The colonial contexts and postcolonial predicaments of exhibiting Native American cultures and histories in the contemporary United States text Anthropology Anthropology University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dissertation Ph.D.