2026-09-23T06:52:53Z https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh

oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23714 2023-07-10 col_2142_5131 col_2142_14792 com_2142_5130 com_2142_814 com_2142_8903

Burkhardt, Richard W. Maltz, Alesia 2011-05-07T14:24:21Z 2011-05-07T14:24:21Z 10000-01-01 1990 I contrast the language of biochemists and physicians, and describe how language obstructed acceptance of the deficiency theory and vitamin hypothesis in Great Britain at the beginning of this century. The dissertation is divided into three sections. The first examines tension between proof and belief. I discuss: (a) why biochemists came to believe in the existence of vitamins, even though they had no chemical proof from the test tube; (b) why physicians would not discount the germ theory of beri-beri; and (c) the loss of face of biochemists who found themselves unable either to modify their methods or to find alternative ways to prove the existence of vitamins. The second analyzes the controversy over rickets to demonstrate that the resolution of the controversy entailed a complete redefinition of the term. I describe: (a) one definition popular before the controversy; (b) the development of the controversy between the Cambridge and Glasgow Schools emphasizing how the social milieu inhibited the process of redefinition; and (c) changing conceptions of pathogenesis, treatment, diagnosis, etc. "The third section explicitly discusses the function of language, its significance for the players, the disciplines and the controversy. Specifically, I describe: (a) Mellanby's issues about professional identity; (b) the ways in which choice of audience and professional influence affected the priority dispute between Funk and Hopkins over the ""discovery"" of vitamins; (c) the significance of the protracted discussion about the naming of vitamins; and (d) the dispute over negative causality and functional explanations." These examples highlight the major issues of the dissertation, including the nature of discovery, of theory competition, and the disharmony inherent in disciplinary-based notions of what constituted an explanation. Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:24:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9021725.pdf: 17390914 bytes, checksum: fa09f4b7a25c9dede3ea8901c5f790bd (MD5) Previous issue date: 1990 Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:06:21Z Item is restricted indefinitely. Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:31:51-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission U of I Only AAI9021725 (UMI)AAI9021725 http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23714 eng Copyright 1990 Maltz, Alesia Language, Modern Health Sciences, Nutrition History of Science The role of language in the discovery and acceptance of vitamins text Language, Modern Health Sciences, Nutrition History of Science Language, Modern Health Sciences, Nutrition History of Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dissertation Ph.D.