<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-20T11:44:12Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/29476" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/29476</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-07-10</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_10761</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_10755</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_234</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:contributor>Zhai, ChengXiang</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Han, Jiawei</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Chang, Kevin C-C.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Si, Luo</dc:contributor>
          <dc:creator>Kotov, Alexander</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2012-02-01T00:48:12Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2014-02-01T11:00:29Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2011-12</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2012-02-01T00:48:12Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2011-12</dc:date>
          <dc:description>The query-based search paradigm is based on the assumption that the searchers are able to come up with the effective differentiator terms to make their queries specific
and precise. In reality, however, a large number of queries are problematic return either too many or no relevant documents in the initial search results. Existing search
systems provide no assistance to the users when they cannot formulate an effective keyword query and receive the search results of poor quality. In some cases, the users
may intentionally formulate broad or exploratory queries (for example, when they want to explore a particular topic without having a clear search goal). In other cases,
the users may not know the domain of the search problem sufficiently well and their queries may suffer from the problems, of which they may not be aware, such as
ambiguity or vocabulary mismatch. Although the quality of search results can be improved by reformulating the queries, finding a good reformulation is often non-trivial
and takes time. Therefore, in addition to the existing work on using the relevant documents from the top-ranked initially retrieved results to retrieve more relevant
documents, it is important from both theoretical and practical points of view to also develop an interactive retrieval model, which would allow the search systems to
improve the users' search experience with exploratory queries, which return too many relevant documents, and difficult queries, which return no relevant documents in the
initial search results. In this thesis, we propose and study three methods for interactive feedback that allow the search systems to interactively improve the quality of
retrieval results for difficult and exploratory queries: question feedback, sense feedback and concept feedback. All three methods are based on a novel question-guided
interactive retrieval model, in which a search system collaborates with the users in achieving their search goals by generating the natural language refinement
questions. 
The first method, \textit{question feedback} is aimed at interactive refinement of short, exploratory keyword-based queries by automatically generating a list
clarification questions, which can be presented next to the standard ranked list of the retrieved documents. Clarification questions place the broad query terms into a
specific context and help the user focus on and explore a particular aspect of the query topic. By clicking on a question, the users are presented with an answer to it
and by clicking on the answer they can be redirected to the document containing the answer for further exploration. Therefore, clarification questions can be considered
as shortcuts to specific answers. Questions also provide a more natural mechanism to elicit relevance feedback from the users. A query can be expanded by adding the terms
from the clicked question and resubmitted to the search system, generating a new set of questions and documents retrieved with the expanded query. Enabling interactive
question-based retrieval requires major changes to all components of the retrieval process: from more sophisticated methods of content analysis to ranking and feedback.
Specifically, we propose the methods to locate and index the content, which can be used for question generation, and to generate and rank well-formed and meaningful
questions in response to user queries. We implemented the prototype of a question-guided search system on a subset of Wikipedia and conducted the user studies, which
demonstrated the effectiveness of the question-based feedback strategy.
The second method, \textit{sense feedback}, is aimed at clarifying the intended sense of ambiguous query terms with automatically generated clarification questions in the
form of \textit{``Did you mean \{ambiguous query term\} as \{sense label\}?''}, where the sense label can be a single term or a phrase. Our approach to sense detection is
based on the assumption that the senses of a word can be differentiated by grouping and analyzing all the contexts, in which a given word appears in the collection. We
propose to detect the senses of a query term by clustering the global (based on the entire collection) graph of relationships of a query term with other terms in the
collection vocabulary. We conducted simulation experiments with two graph clustering algorithms and two methods for calculating the strength of relationship between the
terms in the graph to determine the upper bound for the retrieval effectiveness of sense feedback and the best method for detecting the senses. We also proposed several
alternative methods to represent the discovered senses and conducted a user study to evaluate the effectiveness of each representation method with the actual retrieval
performance of user sense selections.
The third method, \textit{concept feedback}, utilizes ConceptNet, an on-line commonsense knowledge base and natural language processing toolkit. As opposed to ontologies
and other knowledge bases, such as WordNet and Wikipedia, ConceptNet is not limited to hyponym/hypernym relations and features a more diverse relational ontology as well
as a graph-based knowledge representation model, which allows to make more complex textual inferences. First, we conducted simulation experiments by expanding each query
term with the related concepts from ConceptNet, which demonstrated a considerable upper bound potential of tapping into a knowledge base to overcome the problem of the
lack of positive relevance signals in the initial retrieval results for difficult queries. Second, we proposed and experimentally evaluated heuristic and machine learning
based methods for selecting a small number of candidate concepts for query expansion. The experimental results on multiple data sets indicate that concept feedback can
effectively improve the retrieval performance of difficult queries both when used in isolation as well as in combination with pseudo-relevance feedback.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-12-01T16:56:19Z
Item was in collections:
University of Illinois Theses &amp; Dissertations (ID: 1)
No. of bitstreams: 3
Alexander_Kotov.pdf: 652410 bytes, checksum: 24dc6a47e13bfca0df2943229a2c3006 (MD5)
thesis.tex: 231191 bytes, checksum: e0803b93fdce74a1a733278ff5df47e7 (MD5)
Kotov_Alexander.pdf: 652410 bytes, checksum: 24dc6a47e13bfca0df2943229a2c3006 (MD5)</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Made available in DSpace on 2012-02-01T00:48:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3
Kotov_Alexander.pdf: 652390 bytes, checksum: bcc7f388e8acde602547a7e56dcb66d5 (MD5)
license.txt: 4066 bytes, checksum: 6390b09c1b6f3d7525b0a9a74ef2eec3 (MD5)
thesis.tex: 231191 bytes, checksum: e0803b93fdce74a1a733278ff5df47e7 (MD5)</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-02-01T00:50:39Z
Item is restricted until 2014-02-01T00:50:07Z</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-02-01T11:00:29Z
Item was in collections:
Dissertations and Theses - Computer Science (ID: 587)
Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204)
No. of bitstreams: 4
Kotov_Alexander.pdf.txt: 241954 bytes, checksum: 233a21d17952347024d9f64e1ea61b53 (MD5)
Kotov_Alexander.pdf: 652390 bytes, checksum: bcc7f388e8acde602547a7e56dcb66d5 (MD5)
license.txt: 4066 bytes, checksum: 6390b09c1b6f3d7525b0a9a74ef2eec3 (MD5)
thesis.tex: 231191 bytes, checksum: e0803b93fdce74a1a733278ff5df47e7 (MD5)</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-02-01T11:00:29Z</dc:description>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29476</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>Copyright 2011 Alexander Kotov</dc:rights>
          <dc:subject>Information Retrieval</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Interactive Feedback</dc:subject>
          <dc:title>Leveraging user interaction to improve search experience with difficult and exploratory queries</dc:title>
          <dc:type>Dissertation / Thesis</dc:type>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <degree>
            <department>Computer Science</department>
            <departmentCode>1434</departmentCode>
            <discipline>Computer Science</discipline>
            <disciplineCode>0112</disciplineCode>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <level>Dissertation</level>
            <name>Ph.D.</name>
            <program>PHD:Compter Science -UIUC</program>
            <programCode>10KS0112PHD</programCode>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
