<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-20T06:42:09Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/42124" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/42124</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-07-11</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_8800</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5132</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:contributor>Davidson, Frederick G.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Davidson, Frederick G.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Zhang, Jinming</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Bowles, Melissa A.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Templin, Jonathan</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Tremblay, Annie</dc:contributor>
          <dc:creator>Yi, Yeonsook</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2013-02-03T19:16:27Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2013-02-03T19:16:27Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2015-02-03T11:00:32Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2012-12</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2013-02-03T19:16:27Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2012-12</dc:date>
          <dc:description>This dissertation is based on two major projects, cognitive diagnostic model comparison and
implementing cognitive diagnostic assessment in an institutional test. In the first project, five
cognitive diagnostic models are empirically compared for language test data under a unified
general modeling framework. The models are applied to three sets of data, TOEFL Reading,
TOEFL Listening and ECPE Grammar and examined in terms of their model fit to the data and
functioning. The item-association root mean squared error values and multiple information
criteria all indicate that the general model (LCDM) and the compensatory-RUM model are the
best fit to all three test data sets used. The functioning of the models examined through multiple
indices also unanimously confirms these fit indices. Based on these results, a discussion follows
to argue that the general modeling framework is optimal for language assessment data due to its
much greater flexibility. The behaviors of the compensatory RUM and non-compensatory RUM
(Fusion) models are also compared and the differences are analyzed.
Cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) has gained attention in language testing since
late 90’s. A few models of this new assessment method have been applied to the response data of
different language tests, yielding encouraging results in general. Most of these empirical studies
used large-scale, standardized tests and retrofitted to these existing tests.
The second research study in this proposal was an effort to go beyond this limited
research context of previous studies of CDA in language testing. Using a new psychometric
cognitive diagnostic model (Log-linear cognitive diagnostic model) and task type (elicited
imitation task) as well as constructing the EIT test with a CDA implementation in mind from the
outset (thus not retrofitting), this project tried to implement a cognitive diagnostic assessment in
an institutional placement test. In doing so, the study employed a statistical method (resampling
technique) as a way to resolve the issue caused by a small size of a test-taker pool at an
institution, which is usually smaller than the optimal size for CDA implementation. It also tried
to analyze polytomously scored response data.
The study achieved a success at estimating with polytomous response data that were
scored with a three-point scale (i.e., zero to two points). Though it was a limited success (in that
more complex rating scale could not be analyzed), it was the first success in estimating with
polytomous response data in the context of CDA research in language testing.
The analysis results of the study also provide many insights and implications for the
process of Q-matrix construction, grain size of attributes, appropriate task types and item types
for cognitive diagnostic assessment as well as appropriate cognitive psychometric models for
differing contexts of CDA implementation. The study also rediscovers or introduces the
usefulness of bootstrap resampling method as an approach that is gaining popularity even in
areas where only traditional quantitative methods are usually employed.
Also, the networking occurred in this project between students in different
specializations could be established as a new networking model in language testing. Considering
such a collaboration is very much needed for implementing a relatively new measurement
method in a specific knowledge domain, the co-work attempted in this project could serve as a
model for implementing CDA in language testing.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-12-07T13:54:19Z
Item was in collections:
University of Illinois Theses &amp; Dissertations (ID: 1)
No. of bitstreams: 1
Yi_Yeonsook.pdf: 2634008 bytes, checksum: e8d4e1ecfce599960fefeebf2036cdc4 (MD5)</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Made available in DSpace on 2013-02-03T19:16:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
Yeonsook_Yi.pdf: 2810469 bytes, checksum: c5d8631f2b2714cb4a92e7f419bff55a (MD5)
license.txt: 4060 bytes, checksum: 16b773af5d93263bfb1db73ba19b840b (MD5)</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:11:49-05:00
Original Data
Group with Access UIUC Users [automated]
Release Date: 2015-02-03 13:18:53 UTC
Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Seth Robbins (srobbins@illinois.edu) on 2013-02-03T19:18:55Z
Item is restricted until 2015-02-03T19:18:53Z</dc:description>
          <dc:description>U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 42071 on 2015-02-03T11:00:32Z.</dc:description>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/42124</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>Copyright 2012 Yeonsook Yi</dc:rights>
          <dc:subject>cognitive diagnostic assessment</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>cognitive diagnostic model comparison</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>general modeling framework</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>language test data</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) Reading and Listening</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>university French placement test</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>elicited imitation task</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>resampling</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>polytomous</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>networking in language testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Examination for the Certificate of Proficiency in English (ECPE) Grammar</dc:subject>
          <dc:title>Implementing a cognitive diagnostic assessment in an institutional test: a new networking model in language testing and experiment with a new psychometric model and task type</dc:title>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <degree>
            <department>Educational Psychology</department>
            <departmentCode>1616</departmentCode>
            <discipline>Educational Psychology</discipline>
            <disciplineCode>0210</disciplineCode>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <level>Dissertation</level>
            <name>Ph.D.</name>
            <program>PHD:Educatnl Psychology -UIUC</program>
            <programCode>10KS0210PHD</programCode>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
