<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-22T03:48:15Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/70820" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/70820</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-07-11</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_14832</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_14831</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5126</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:creator>Magrill, Samuel Morse</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2014-12-16T04:12:43Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2014-12-16T04:12:43Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>10000-01-01</dc:date>
          <dc:date>1983</dc:date>
          <dc:date>1983</dc:date>
          <dc:description>This dissertation is a comparative analysis of three compositions: Chaconne in D minor for solo violin by Johann Sebastian Bach, Variations on a Theme of Haydn, opus 56a (the orchestral version) by Johannes Brahms, and Quaderno Musicale di Annalibera for piano solo by Luigi Dallapiccola. The compositions, each a set of variations, are discussed from five perspectives, the dissertation itself being a set of five variations on the topic of investigating variations.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Prose. a discussion of the language used in speaking about compositions. Specifically, I look at what critics have written about the three works and explore ways to discuss the compositions and not the composer's and critic's fantasies.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Form and Rhythm. a segmentation of each work according to phrase structure and changes in rhythmic values. In addition, I discuss the principle of diminishing note values: as a composition progresses, the note values become shorter.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Tonality. an investigation of the concept of completion, of the conditions under which the ending, beyond terminating the composition, also concludes it. Using Schenkerian analysis, I explore how tonality creates coherence and distinctions in the three works.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Invariants and their Treatment. an investigation of invariant pitch sequences and rhythms.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Networks. a probe of the networks of relationships generated without regard to sequence in a set of variations. I make &amp;quot;distinguishing descriptions&amp;quot; showing the grid of distinctions that allows for distinguishing a particular composition from all other compositions and distinguishing each of its parts as well. I ask, &amp;quot;To what extent is each variation in a set distinct from the others, and how is it distinguished?&amp;quot; By this method, I want to revitalize compositions or at least retard their decay for me, the listener.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>This dissertation represents my attempt to contribute to the state of the art of analysis and, with Chapter V in particular, implies my thesis: Network analysis is required for comparative studies in the arts.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-16T04:12:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
8309979.pdf: 8871790 bytes, checksum: c41ca830de889dbf7f625fa33e3f7542 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 1983</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 70986
Lift date: Forever
Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs</dc:description>
          <dc:description>U of I Only</dc:description>
          <dc:description>253 p.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Thesis (D.M.A.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1983.</dc:description>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/70820</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>(UMI)AAI8309979</dc:identifier>
          <dc:subject>Music</dc:subject>
          <dc:title>The Principle of Variation: A Study in the Selection of Differences With Examples From Dallapiccola, J. S. Bach, and Brahms</dc:title>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <degree>
            <department>Music</department>
            <discipline>Music</discipline>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <level>Dissertation</level>
            <name>D.M.A.</name>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
