<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-23T10:07:22Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80337" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80337</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-07-11</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_8800</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5132</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:contributor>Rodgers, Frederick A.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:creator>Mizerka, Patricia Miceli</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2015-09-25T19:56:36Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2015-09-25T19:56:36Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>10000-01-01</dc:date>
          <dc:date>1999</dc:date>
          <dc:date>1999</dc:date>
          <dc:description>The findings show that while there were no real differences, and no disadvantages to either group in reading comprehension, there were some specific advantages to each group. The advantages to each group were directly correlated to the teaching methods used. Implications for teaching suggest ways in which a teacher can use a literature-based program for reading and discussion, yet not give up total control of the reading program. Implications for further study suggest that writing can be used to help students reach a higher level of involvement in reading and discussion, and that teachers and students need to refine questioning strategies.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:56:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5)
9944939.pdf: 6750634 bytes, checksum: 44290499827344d5cea9a87c44fce660 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 1999</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 81619
Lift date: Forever
Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs</dc:description>
          <dc:description>U of I Only</dc:description>
          <dc:description>170 p.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999.</dc:description>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80337</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>(MiAaPQ)AAI9944939</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:subject>Education, Language and Literature</dc:subject>
          <dc:title>The Impact of Teacher-Directed Literature Circles Versus Student-Directed Literature Circles on Reading Comprehension at the Sixth-Grade Level</dc:title>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <degree>
            <department>Education</department>
            <discipline>Education</discipline>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <level>Dissertation</level>
            <name>Ed.D.</name>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
