<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-18T20:16:22Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81394" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81394</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-07-11</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_8906</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_8904</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_8903</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:contributor>Prior, Paul</dc:contributor>
          <dc:creator>Lunsford, Karen J.</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2015-09-25T20:15:04Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2015-09-25T20:15:04Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>10000-01-01</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2003</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2003</dc:date>
          <dc:description>In Chapter Five, I apply the findings of these case studies to writing studies pedagogy, claiming that to prepare students to argue in diverse settings and to employ evolving media, writing courses must call attention to tacit and explicit negotiations over expectations, knowledge, tools, and so on. I consider the potential for the collaboratory---a distributed, shared suite of resources---to provide opportunities to engage in complex, reflective rhetorical practices. In sum, I argue that the notion of  distributed argumentative activity offers a pedagogically as well as theoretically rich account of how people continually redefine argument/argumentation and alter the conditions under which their arguments may be deemed successful in school, disciplinary, and workplace contexts.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5)
3101912.pdf: 14169822 bytes, checksum: 11977a3d4afa722d9a5f265d2dff86f8 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2003</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82675
Lift date: Forever
Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs</dc:description>
          <dc:description>U of I Only</dc:description>
          <dc:description>294 p.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003.</dc:description>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81394</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>(MiAaPQ)AAI3101912</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:subject>Library Science</dc:subject>
          <dc:title>Distributed Argumentative Activity: Redefining Arguments and Their Re -Mediation From a Sociohistoric Perspective</dc:title>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <degree>
            <department>English</department>
            <discipline>English</discipline>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <level>Dissertation</level>
            <name>Ph.D.</name>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
