<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-25T21:43:07Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87606" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87606</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-07-11</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_18657</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_18656</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_8903</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:contributor>Wagner, Steven J.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:creator>Heikes, Deborah K.</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2015-09-28T16:20:53Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2015-09-28T16:20:53Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>10000-01-01</dc:date>
          <dc:date>1998</dc:date>
          <dc:date>1998</dc:date>
          <dc:description>The second problem surrounding a Kantian view of mind concerns the relationship of concepts and consciousness. For Kant concepts are entirely dependent upon mental unity, but this mental unity only results from the actual use of concepts in synthesizing representations. In other words, Kant's account of mind is circular, but I argue that it is not viciously so. In fact, Kant's account of consciousness not only avoids vicious circularity but also provides a useful model for contemporary investigations into consciousness insofar as it accounts for both mental unity and personal consciousness within a functionalist view of mind.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T16:20:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5)
9904477.pdf: 3824382 bytes, checksum: c176167d28507e3b1702d62f105be0ed (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 1998</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88887
Lift date: Forever
Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs</dc:description>
          <dc:description>U of I Only</dc:description>
          <dc:description>173 p.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998.</dc:description>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87606</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>(MiAaPQ)AAI9904477</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
          <dc:subject>Philosophy</dc:subject>
          <dc:title>Concepts, Content, and Consciousness: A Kantian View of Mind</dc:title>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <degree>
            <department>Philosophy</department>
            <discipline>Philosophy</discipline>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <level>Dissertation</level>
            <name>Ph.D.</name>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
