<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-23T10:56:28Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/99485" metadataPrefix="etdms" verb="GetRecord">https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/99485</identifier>
        <datestamp>2023-07-11</datestamp>
        <setSpec>col_2142_5131</setSpec>
        <setSpec>col_2142_16320</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_5130</setSpec>
        <setSpec>com_2142_8915</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdms11.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.1/etdmsdc.xsd">
          <dc:contributor>Sharpe, Jamelle C.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Sharpe, Jamelle C.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Aviram, Amitai</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Keenan, Patrick</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Shao, Dan</dc:contributor>
          <dc:creator>Zhang, Aisi</dc:creator>
          <dc:date>2018-03-13T17:29:13Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2018-03-13T17:29:13Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2067-03-13T06:00:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2017-11-27</dc:date>
          <dc:date>2017-12</dc:date>
          <dc:description>Constitutional review, the idea that adjudicators have the authority to invalidate laws or governmental actions that conflict with the constitution, has spread around the world over the past two centuries. However, there is no constitutional review in contemporary China. This dissertation uses the methodology of public choice theory to examine the feasibility of developing constitutional review in modern China.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2019-12-01</dc:description>
          <dc:description>The student, Aisi Zhang, accepted the attached license on 2017-11-21 at 16:38.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>The student, Aisi Zhang, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2017-11-21 at 16:40.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2017-11-27 at 09:21.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11748 on 2018-03-13 at 10:33:23</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-13T17:29:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
ZHANG-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf: 1861947 bytes, checksum: edb6917bf47437f547858f7decbd1ea3 (MD5)
LICENSE.txt: 4207 bytes, checksum: 5e6a309138d381e143cfa2200e8597fd (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2017-11-27</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 105452
Lift date: 2020-03-13T17:29:20Z
Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 105452
Lift date: 2020-03-13T17:32:30Z
Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 105452
Lift date: 2020-03-13T17:36:05Z
Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Limited Restriction set for Item 105452 on 2018-05-08T21:48:45Z with date 2067-03-13 by astein@illinois.edu.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Limited Restriction set for Item 105452 on 2018-05-08T21:49:04Z with date 2067-03-13 by astein@illinois.edu.</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Author petitioned graduate college for dissertation to be closed access for 50 years. Petition was granted by the Thesis Office and restriction implemented by astein on 2018-05-08 at 16:48 CDT</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Limited</dc:description>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/99485</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>Copyright 2017 Aisi Zhang</dc:rights>
          <dc:subject>Constitutional review</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Public choice</dc:subject>
          <dc:title>A public choice analysis of developing constitutional review in contemporary China</dc:title>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <degree>
            <department>Law</department>
            <discipline>Law</discipline>
            <grantor>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</grantor>
            <level>Dissertation</level>
            <name>J.S.D.</name>
          </degree>
        </thesis>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
