University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Reading between the lines: psycholinguistic indices of prediction and formulaicity in language comprehension

Bulkes, Nyssa Z

Content Files
BULKES-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/98231

Description

Title
Reading between the lines: psycholinguistic indices of prediction and formulaicity in language comprehension
Author(s)
Bulkes, Nyssa Z
Issue Date
2017-06-13
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Tanner, Darren
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Tanner, Darren
Committee Member(s)
  • Christianson, Kiel
  • Garnsey, Susan
  • Ionin, Tania
Department of Study
Linguistics
Discipline
Linguistics
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Date of Ingest
2017-09-29T16:39:08Z
Keyword(s)
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Idioms
  • Figurative language
  • Formulaic language
  • Sentence processing
  • Second language acquisition
  • Eyetracking
Abstract
A comprehensive model of language processing must account for not only how people process literal language, but also how nonliteral language is processed. Further, of theoretical interest to psycholinguists is the role that prediction plays in language processing, namely the conditions under which anticipating linguistic forms and structures can facilitate language comprehension. L1 research has underscored prediction as facilitative; namely, the more informative the surrounding context, the more readers anticipate upcoming information. Research using the transposed-letter (TL) effect shows that a target with transposed letters (cholocate) are read faster than targets containing substitutions (choeotate), as letter position/identity are encoded separately (Perea & Lupker, 2003, 2004). Luke and Christianson (2012) demonstrated that higher semantic constraints lead to specific expectations for letter position/identity, showing that TL effects index prediction. While L2 research has investigated prediction in L2 processing, this research primarily addresses comprehension of literal language. In cases of semantically opaque—or idiomatic—language, it is unclear whether phrase literality affects predictive mechanisms in L1 or L2 processing. Finally, it is also unclear whether semantic opacity differentiates how expressions—literal or nonliteral—are stored and retrieved from the lexicon, namely in cases where dimension such as whole-string or substring frequency are controlled for. Results from three experiments in this dissertation support a dual-route model of language processing, where the mode of processing that is employed is ultimately determined by context.
Graduation Semester
2017-08
Type of Resource
text
Permalink
http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98231
Copyright and License Information
Copyright 2017 Nyssa Bulkes

Owning Collections

Dissertations and Theses - Linguistics
Graduate Dissertations and Theses at Illinois PRIMARY
Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois