Going all in or going slow: Preferences for radical versus incremental trajectories of behavior change

Lohmann, Sophie

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/105050 Copy

Description

Title

Going all in or going slow: Preferences for radical versus incremental trajectories of behavior change

Author(s)

Lohmann, Sophie

Issue Date

2019-04-17

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Albarracín, Dolores

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Albarracín, Dolores

Committee Member(s)

• Cohen, Dov
• Stern, Chadly
• Napolitano, Chris
• Chan, Man-pui S

Department of Study

Psychology

Discipline

Psychology

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Date of Ingest

2019-08-23T20:36:00Z

Keyword(s)

• behavior change
• goal setting
• goal pursuit
• self-regulation
• motivation

Abstract

There are different temporal paths to achieving a goal such as exercising. Somebody with a radical change trajectory will invest large amounts of time and effort into the goal early and then attempt to sustain this level of effort over time. In contrast, somebody with an incremental change trajectory will start small and, over time, increase time and effort until the goal is met. Study 1 (N = 250) tested a measure of preferences for different trajectories as an individual difference. The measure had acceptable convergent and divergent validity and allowed us to detect that preferences for radical change predicted better trait self-regulation and less procrastination. Study 2 (N = 87) investigated how each type of trajectory is mentally represented. Results indicated that radical and incremental change goals are represented verbally in the form of self-talk and suggested that radical change goals are associated with a more action-oriented mindset. Study 3 (N = 176) included an experimental manipulation of change preferences and longitudinal measures of their effects on language learning over the course of one week. Beginners did not form radical plans even when the manipulation had successfully convinced them of the convenience of radical trajectories. In contrast, advanced learners who pursued radical trajectories did set radical intentions and subsequently dedicated 40-50 minutes more practice time throughout the week than those who set incremental intentions. The contribution of this doctoral thesis was to introduce a conceptualization of change trajectory preferences as a new construct and examine predictions about their effects.

Graduation Semester

2019-05

Type of Resource

text

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105050

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2019 Sophie Lohmann

Owning Collections