Desirable effects and undesirable side effects of interventions aimed to improve auditors' exercise of professional skepticism

Johanns, Alex Jeffrey

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/115299 Copy

Description

Title

Desirable effects and undesirable side effects of interventions aimed to improve auditors' exercise of professional skepticism

Author(s)

Johanns, Alex Jeffrey

Issue Date

2022-04-13

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Hobson, Jessen L

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Peecher, Mark E

Committee Member(s)

• Mendoza, Kim I
• Napolitano, Chris M
• Zhou, Yuepin D

Department of Study

Accountancy

Discipline

Accountancy

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Keyword(s)

• professional skepticism
• audit quality
• wise-thinking disposition
• individual differences
• mindset

Abstract

I propose that the strength of auditors’ wise-thinking dispositions not only characterizes how they naturally exercise professional skepticism but moderates their responses to situational interventions aimed to help auditors exercise professional skepticism more appropriately. To explore these predictions, I conduct an experiment to examine interactions between the strength of auditors’ wise-thinking dispositions and two interventions that have been proposed in the audit literature: (1) revising the language used to frame auditing standards to include phrases designed to activate a more appropriately skeptical mindset; and (2) requiring auditors to document a minimum amount of evidence contrary to management’s assertions. I predict and find that these interventions help auditors who have weaker wise-thinking dispositions to exercise professional skepticism more appropriately and more efficiently, but also have potentially costly side effects as they reduce the efficiency with which auditors with stronger wise-thinking dispositions display professional skepticism. This study has implications for standard setters, regulators, and audit firms in their continued efforts to encourage auditors to appropriately exercise professional skepticism.

Graduation Semester

2022-05

Type of Resource

Thesis

Handle URL

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/115299

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2022 Alex Johanns

Owning Collections