Aggregative swab sampling method for romaine lettuce show similar quality indicators and microbial profiles compared to composite tissue samples in a pilot study
Gathman, Rachel Jade
This item's files can only be accessed by the System Administrators group.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/115962
Description
Title
Aggregative swab sampling method for romaine lettuce show similar quality indicators and microbial profiles compared to composite tissue samples in a pilot study
Author(s)
Gathman, Rachel Jade
Issue Date
2022-07-22
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Stasiewicz, Matthew J
Committee Member(s)
Miller, Michael J
Feng, Hao
Department of Study
Food Science & Human Nutrition
Discipline
Food Science & Human Nutrition
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
M.S.
Degree Level
Thesis
Keyword(s)
preharvest produce safety
leafy greens
microbial community
food safety sampling
Abstract
The practice of collecting preharvest leafy greens composite tissue samples produces few positive pathogen results. Aggregative sampling is potentially more representative. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine aggregative swabs’ ability to pick up quality indicators, to detect Escherichia coli, and determine if microbial profiles of swabs and tissues were similar. Aggregative swabs (n=12) and composite tissues (n=14) were collected from a one-acre commercial romaine lettuce field in Salinas, CA. Some field portions were inoculated with a rifampicin resistant E. coli cocktail. Aerobic plate counts (APC), coliform counts, and generic E. coli presence were determined using culture-based methods. Further identification of bacteria, their abundances, and microbial diversity of the samples were determined from microbial community profiling using full-length 16S rRNA sequencing. Recovery of APCs were 9.17±0.43 and 9.21±0.42 log(CFU/g) for tissues and swabs, respectively. Means and variance differences between sample types were insignificant (p=0.38 and p=0.92, respectively). Coliform recoveries were 3.80±0.76 and 4.19±1.15 log(CFU/g) for tissues and swabs, respectively. Means and variance differences between sample types were insignificant (p=0.30 and p=0.16, respectively). Presence of generic E. coli showed that swabs could detect E. coli more often than tissues with 8/12 swabs detecting E. coli compared to 3/14 tissues. Microbial profiling revealed that swabs and tissues have similar alpha diversities (p=0.75) and the most prevalent bacterial taxa in similar abundances. These data suggest aggregative swabs perform similar, if not better, than tissue samples in recovering quality and food safety indicators.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.