Natural language processing to support evidence quality assessment of clinical literature

Hoang, Khanh Linh

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/120224 Copy

Description

Title

Natural language processing to support evidence quality assessment of clinical literature

Author(s)

Hoang, Khanh Linh

Issue Date

2023-04-03

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Kilicoglu, Halil

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Kilicoglu, Halil

Committee Member(s)

• Ludäscher, Bertram
• Diesner, Jana
• Boyce, Richard D

Department of Study

Information Sciences

Discipline

Library & Information Science

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Keyword(s)

• Natural Language Processing
• Machine Learning
• Biomedical
• Evidence Quality Assessment

Abstract

Evidence Synthesis is the process of synthesizing information from clinical literature to translate the research findings into patient care and healthcare policy. Throughout the evidence synthesis process, a critical yet challenging step is the quality assessment of clinical studies. Quality in research can be considered through two aspects: methodological quality which concerns how rigorously a research is designed and conducted, and reporting quality which describes how transparently a piece of scientific work is reported as a publication. This thesis explores natural language processing (NLP) approaches to support evidence quality assessment of clinical studies. Specifically, I consider different levels of information granularity used for evidence assessment, and implemented three machine learning developments: (1) Classification of evidence types from clinical publications based on study designs, (2) Classification of sentences from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with checklist items recommended in reporting guidelines, (3) Extraction of fine- grained methodological characteristics from RCTs to assist methodological quality assessment. Applications of these NLP approaches range from assisting authors in checking their manuscripts for compliance with reporting guidelines and supporting journal editors and peer reviewers in assessing papers (pre-publication) to assisting systematic reviewers in synthesizing evidence and meta-researchers in studying research rigor and transparency (post-publication).

Graduation Semester

2023-05

Type of Resource

Thesis

Handle URL

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/120224

Copyright and License Information

N/A

Owning Collections