University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Assessing the Agreement in Retraction Indexing Across 4 Multidisciplinary Sources: Crossref, Retraction Watch, Scopus, & Web of Science

Schneider, Jodi; Lee, Jou; Zheng, Heng; Salami, Malik

Content Files
STI2023RetractionIndexingAssessment-Malik_Salami.pdf

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/122294

Description

Title
Assessing the Agreement in Retraction Indexing Across 4 Multidisciplinary Sources: Crossref, Retraction Watch, Scopus, & Web of Science
Author(s)
  • Schneider, Jodi
  • Lee, Jou
  • Zheng, Heng
  • Salami, Malik
Contributor(s)
Hsiao, Tzu-Kun
Issue Date
2023-09-28
Keyword(s)
  • Data Quality
  • Retraction
  • Retraction Indexing
  • RISRS
  • Metadata
Date of Ingest
2024-04-03T15:07:04-05:00
Abstract
Previous research has posited a correlation between poor indexing and inadvertent post-retraction citation. However, to date, there has been limited systematic study of retraction indexing quality: we are aware of one database-wide comparison of PubMed and Web of Science, and multiple smaller studies highlighting indexing problems for items with the same reason for retraction or same field of study. To assess the agreement between multidisciplinary retraction indexes, we create a union list of 49,924 publications with DOIs from the retraction indices of at least one of Crossref, Retraction Watch, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only 1593 (3%) are deemed retracted by the intersection of all four sources. For 10,512 publications (21%), there is disagreement: at least one source deems them retracted while another lacks retraction indexing. Of the items deemed retracted by at least one source, retraction indexing was lacking for 32% covered in Scopus, 7% covered in Crossref, and 4% covered in Web of Science. We manually examined 201 items from the union list and found that 115/201 (57.21%) DOIs were retracted publications while 59 (29.35%) were retraction notices. In future work we plan to use a validated version of this union list to assess the retraction indexing of subject-specific sources.
Has Part
  • https://doi.org/10.55835/6441e5cae04dbe5586d06a5f
  • https://github.com/infoqualitylab/retraction-indexing-agreement
  • https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-8847584_V2
Type of Resource
  • text
  • still image
Genre of Resource
conference paper
Language
eng
Sponsor(s)/Grant Number(s)
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation G-2022-19409

Owning Collections

Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science (RISRS) PRIMARY