Inimicitiae in Tacitus

Rudman, Nicholas Arthur

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/124517 Copy

Description

Title

Inimicitiae in Tacitus

Author(s)

Rudman, Nicholas Arthur

Issue Date

2024-04-12

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Walters, Brian

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Walters, Brian

Committee Member(s)

• Augoustakis, Antony
• Traill, Ariana
• Williams, Craig

Department of Study

Classics

Discipline

Classical Philology

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Keyword(s)

• Latin Literature
• Imperial Literature
• Historiography
• Tacitus
• Enmity
• Interpersonal Conflict

Language

eng

Abstract

This dissertation analyzes the depiction of personal feuding, or inimicitiae, within Tacitus’ historical works. Said analysis is grounded in passages from Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus which imply that the ability to regulate feuding among citizens is a key means of evaluating a system of government and that the Roman republic collapsed because it failed to do so. Accordingly, Tacitus’ portrayal of enmity serves as a means of illuminating his depiction of the principate. I begin by reconstructing early 2nd-century C.E. beliefs concerning republican feuding through analyzing the work of Tacitus, his contemporaries, and earlier literature that likely influenced the historian’s thought. I also demonstrate that Tacitus’ emperors strive to present themselves as controlling the harmful effects of inimicitiae, even if they do not always live up to this ideal. The second chapter focuses on feuding over the imperial succession, arguing that the question of choosing the next ruler produced endless fights over power resembling those that destroyed the republic. My third chapter examines feuds that do not involve the imperial family directly and demonstrates that while the change in governments did alter the ways in which elite Romans conducted inimicitiae, said changes did not make feuding less dangerous and opened new opportunities for enemies to use the legal system against one another. Finally, I conclude by discussing reconciliation in Tacitus, contending that the historian shows that the emperors genuinely could act as “reconcilers-in-chief” who settled the feuds of their subjects, but that in practice, they more often abuse this role to protect their corrupt underlings. These points build to the main conclusion, namely that in Tacitus’ presentation, the changes to the nature of inimicitiae brought about by the emperors hardly solved the problem of feuding. This aligns with recent scholarly trends arguing that Tacitus does not present a solution to any issue, but rather prompts his audience to consider the strengths and weaknesses of different alternatives.

Graduation Semester

2024-05

Type of Resource

Text

Handle URL

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/124517

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2024 Nicholas Rudman

Owning Collections