Understanding and improving students’ testing experiences in large-scale computer science and other STEM courses
Emeka, Chinedu Alexander
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/129517
Description
Title
Understanding and improving students’ testing experiences in large-scale computer science and other STEM courses
Author(s)
Emeka, Chinedu Alexander
Issue Date
2025-04-10
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Zilles, Craig
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Zilles, Craig
Committee Member(s)
Lewis, Colleen
Silva, Mariana
West, Matthew
Fox, Armando
Department of Study
Computer Science
Discipline
Computer Science
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Assessment
Programming
Testing
Anxiety
Abstract
Computerized exams are becoming increasingly common for computer science courses and large enrollment classes, generally. At several institutions, faculty have adopted a Computer-Based Testing Facility (CBTF) to administer computerized exams. However, despite the benefits of the CBTF, there are concerns from students that the CBTF testing setup leads to negative experiences.
Consequently, we conducted research on how the testing configurations typically used in a CBTF environment impact students’ testing experiences. We focused primarily on test anxiety due to its harmful impacts. We conducted a year-long experiment to measure test anxiety in the CBTF, comparing that to a second setup that may be characterized as Bring Your Own Device (BYOD).
In this dissertation, the results of the experiment are reported. We found that the CBTF did not lead higher test anxiety or diminished performance among students, either for CS students or non-CS students in engineering departments.
Additionally, we conducted research on fairness considerations for question variants on programming exams, which are often used for large-scale exams in a CBTF setting (and in some other contexts). We found that students’ fairness concerns were not associated with whether they had received the harder versions of questions on exams, but rather, were tied to lower overall performance in a course.
Finally, we share findings from a study on second-chance testing, a promising approach for mitigating students’ test anxiety and improving outcomes and experiences in their courses. Students reported that the opportunity for second-chance testing would reduce test anxiety by 30%. This is noteworthy, as second-chance testing can be deployed at marginal cost in a CBTF environment.
Taken together, this dissertation provides key insights to CS and other STEM instructors for effective testing at scale.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.