Negotiating justice, rebel behaviors, and war outcomes in the era of accountability
Kim, Myung Jung
This item's files can only be accessed by the System Administrators group.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/129723
Description
Title
Negotiating justice, rebel behaviors, and war outcomes in the era of accountability
Author(s)
Kim, Myung Jung
Issue Date
2025-04-25
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Prorok, Alyssa K.
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Prorok, Alyssa K.
Committee Member(s)
Diehl, Paul F.
Dai, Xinyuan
Tam, Wendy
Ginsburg, Tom
Department of Study
Political Science
Discipline
Political Science
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Civil War
International Justice
Rebel Behaviors
War Outcome
Exile
Amnesty
Civilian Victimization
Language
eng
Abstract
My three-essay dissertation, Negotiating Justice, Rebel Behaviors, and War Outcomes in the Era of Accountability, examines the impact of the rapid expansion of international criminal prosecutions targeting rebels on the dynamics of civil conflict. Prevailing scholarship has predominantly focused on how the international justice regime undermines amnesty, thereby affecting peace negotiations between rebel groups and governments. Nevertheless, this focus has led to a significant oversight: the tendency of rebel groups to seek refuge in foreign territories to evade punishment. My dissertation addresses this gap by examining both the internal and external threats of punishment faced by rebel actors under the shadow of international prosecutions and their combined effect on rebel behaviors and civil war outcomes. It specifically investigates how and under what conditions the International Criminal Court (ICC) and foreign trials via Universal Jurisdiction (UJ) represent threats to rebel groups. To this end, the research tests three expectations concerning the effects of the international justice regime on: (1) the locations where rebels operate and establish safe havens, (2) the patterns of amnesty provisions for war crimes, and (3) the conflict termination and rebel violence against civilians. Each hypothesis is explored in a separate essay, drawing on large-N analyses with two original datasets (1946–2023) covering rebel leader exile and state commitments to UJ.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
