Are we seeing the same thing? The association between political ideology and consensus of social judgments
Ashur, Yarden
This item's files can only be accessed by the System Administrators group.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/129733
Description
Title
Are we seeing the same thing? The association between political ideology and consensus of social judgments
Author(s)
Ashur, Yarden
Issue Date
2025-04-27
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Stern, Chadly
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Stern, Chadly
Committee Member(s)
Cohen, Dov
Kurdi, Benedek
Moran, Tal
Straka, Brenda
Department of Study
Psychology
Discipline
Psychology
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Political ideology
Social cognition
Language
eng
Abstract
People regularly make social judgments such as judging others’ age, sexual orientation, and personality type based on minimal information. When observers judge characteristics of targets in similar ways, consensus is reached. I propose that observers’ political ideology might affect the magnitude of this consensus. As conservatives are more likely than liberals to believe that group memberships (e.g., gender, race) can be accurately gleaned from minimal information, I predicted that conservatives (versus liberals) would rely on visual cues more and thus have greater consensus when making social judgments. Across two studies (N = 3,521) and 20 judgment dimensions, I found that observers’ ideology was often associated with consensus. Contrary to hypotheses, however, judgments on different dimensions displayed different associations of ideology and consensus. Exploring possible explanations for the pattern of results, I investigated the role of epistemic motivation as a mechanism of the relation between political ideology and consensus. Additionally, I tested the role of social acceptability and association with cues as possible moderators. Overall, epistemic motivation did not explain the relation between ideology and consensus in the predicted manner. Interestingly, social acceptability moderated the effect of ideology on consensus: liberals had more consensus than conservatives when a dimension was more socially acceptable to judge, but conservatives achieved greater consensus than liberals when a dimension was less acceptable to judge. Another moderator, association of judgment with visual cues, showed mixed results. This research sheds light on how a person’s political ideology corresponds to basic forms of social cognition when forming judgments.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
