Are we seeing the same thing? The association between political ideology and consensus of social judgments

Ashur, Yarden

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/129733 Copy

Description

Title

Are we seeing the same thing? The association between political ideology and consensus of social judgments

Author(s)

Ashur, Yarden

Issue Date

2025-04-27

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Stern, Chadly

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Stern, Chadly

Committee Member(s)

• Cohen, Dov
• Kurdi, Benedek
• Moran, Tal
• Straka, Brenda

Department of Study

Psychology

Discipline

Psychology

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Keyword(s)

• Political ideology
• Social cognition

Abstract

People regularly make social judgments such as judging others’ age, sexual orientation, and personality type based on minimal information. When observers judge characteristics of targets in similar ways, consensus is reached. I propose that observers’ political ideology might affect the magnitude of this consensus. As conservatives are more likely than liberals to believe that group memberships (e.g., gender, race) can be accurately gleaned from minimal information, I predicted that conservatives (versus liberals) would rely on visual cues more and thus have greater consensus when making social judgments. Across two studies (N = 3,521) and 20 judgment dimensions, I found that observers’ ideology was often associated with consensus. Contrary to hypotheses, however, judgments on different dimensions displayed different associations of ideology and consensus. Exploring possible explanations for the pattern of results, I investigated the role of epistemic motivation as a mechanism of the relation between political ideology and consensus. Additionally, I tested the role of social acceptability and association with cues as possible moderators. Overall, epistemic motivation did not explain the relation between ideology and consensus in the predicted manner. Interestingly, social acceptability moderated the effect of ideology on consensus: liberals had more consensus than conservatives when a dimension was more socially acceptable to judge, but conservatives achieved greater consensus than liberals when a dimension was less acceptable to judge. Another moderator, association of judgment with visual cues, showed mixed results. This research sheds light on how a person’s political ideology corresponds to basic forms of social cognition when forming judgments.

Graduation Semester

2025-05

Type of Resource

Thesis

Handle URL

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/129733

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2025 Yarden Ashur

Owning Collections