The law and psychology of altruism in allocating scarce medical resources
Zhi, Qiaoyuan
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/130053
Description
Title
The law and psychology of altruism in allocating scarce medical resources
Author(s)
Zhi, Qiaoyuan
Issue Date
2025-07-18
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Bilz, Kenworthey
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Bilz, Kenworthey
Committee Member(s)
Kaplan, Richard
Robbennolt, Jennifer
Ulen, Thomas
Department of Study
Law
Discipline
Law
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
J.S.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
altruism
medical resources
medical decision-making
bias
Abstract
This experimental study (N = 2706) investigated the relationship between costly altruism in medical decision-making and various predictors, such as health status and demographic characteristics. It also examined bias in social expectations about costly altruism, and assesses the impact of inducing individuals to be more other-regarding.
We found that participants tended to expect others to use risk-based criteria, prioritizing individuals at higher medical risk. They did not expect others to rely on remaining life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), or identity-based biased approach such as gender or race. These expectations largely aligned with actual allocation patterns, though there were some differences in degree. For instance, participants did not adopt identity-based stereotypes of altruism, expecting people with greater altruistic reputations to be more altruistic. In practice, these groups did not give significantly more resources than others, and older adults even gave less. Additionally, participants correctly anticipated no racial bias against Black recipients, but underestimated the extent to which Black individuals would actually be favored: participants gave more resources to Black recipients than to White recipients. As to factors designed to increase other-regardingness, the evidence failed to show that the identifiability of a target generally enhances altruism, and it may even reduce it among certain groups.
The study adds to the existing literature on expectations about altruism and altruistic behavior, expanding it to consider circumstances that involve a higher level of self-sacrifice than donating, volunteering, or allocating a fixed amount of money in dictator games. The ambition of this study is to provide empirical evidence to help lawmakers think about the fair allocation of scarce medical resources not just during a pandemic, but even during normal times.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.