"If the people vote, the people win!": The radical right in France
Seitz, Lauren N
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/130088
Description
Title
"If the people vote, the people win!": The radical right in France
Author(s)
Seitz, Lauren N
Issue Date
2025-07-08
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Murphy, John M
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Murphy, John M
Committee Member(s)
Cisneros, Josue David
Finnegan, Cara A
O'Gorman, Ned
Department of Study
Communication
Discipline
Communication
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Populism
Nationalism
Marine Le Pen
Éric Zemmour
France
Abstract
This dissertation explores contemporary right-wing populist nationalism by analyzing the role national identity discourse played in the 2022 French presidential election. My project examines the campaign discourse of two radical right presidential candidates: Marine Le Pen and Éric Zemmour. Through a combination of textual analysis and rhetorical field work, I argue that nationalism and populism intertwine to sustain contemporary right-wing discourse. I draw attention to the rhetorical strategies integral to this discourse and explain how Le Pen and Zemmour customized these strategies to French politics, history, values, and culture. In doing so, I explain how the rhetors relied on national identity rhetoric to support populist nationalism.
My dissertation highlights the rhetorical strategies that the candidates deployed to constitute the nation, its in-group, and out-groups. First, this dissertation examines the ways radical right rhetors constituted ‘the people’ while scapegoating perceived political enemies. I show how the rhetors relied on identification, dissociation, nativism, and anti-elitism to position the election as a mass purification ritual, one that would cast out scapegoats while restoring ‘the people’s’ primacy. Second, my project explores how the rhetors invoked nationalist understandings of space and time in order to constitute the nation as an idealized national community. I describe the ways the rhetors appealed to shared national place, space, and time to create a co-constitutive relationship between the nation and ‘the people.’ Finally, this dissertation analyzes how the candidates crafted political personae designed to align with ‘the people’ and against their enemies. My project highlights how Le Pen and Zemmour portrayed themselves as modern-day embodiments of grand French leaders. In doing so, I illustrate how they created a complementary relationship with voters, as their supporters provided the candidates with political legitimacy. Through my analysis, this dissertation draws attention to the ways that politicians and other public figures define national identity through exclusionary rhetorical strategies. By analyzing how nationalist ideology enables populist political logic, this project expands our understanding of contemporary transnational right-wing discourse.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
