What can we learn from 10 superintendents who identify as instructional leaders: a qualitative study

Baldermann, Jack

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/132582 Copy

Description

Title

What can we learn from 10 superintendents who identify as instructional leaders: a qualitative study

Author(s)

Baldermann, Jack

Issue Date

2025-12-05

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Roegman, Rachel

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Roegman, Rachel

Committee Member(s)

• Hale, Jon
• Herrmann, Mary Beth
• Rice, Patrick

Department of Study

Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp

Discipline

Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ed.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Keyword(s)

• Superintendent Leadership
• Instructional Leadership
• Educational Leadership
• School Leadership
• District Leadership

Language

eng

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore the instructional leadership of experienced and effective superintendents, focusing on how they define it, the standard strategies they employ, and how they perceive different contexts influencing their work. The ten superintendents interviewed for this research are among the most successful and influential superintendents in the country. One was named the National School Superintendent of the Year, two were state superintendents of the year, and among the ten superintendents, they have collectively authored 24 books, all while serving as full-time practitioners. Nine of the ten have extensive consulting and presenting experience, including serving as keynote speakers at multiple national conferences on educational leadership. Braun and Clarke's (2006) reflexive thematic analysis and used to identify themes related to instructional leadership. Data sources included semi-structured interviews and demographic surveys. The final themes were (a) effective instructional leadership entails transformational and adaptive leadership style for long-run success, (b) leader-member exchanges (LMX) leadership styles for short run success, (c) instructional leadership begets boundary-spanning collaboration, (d) effective instructional leadership requires educators to feel responsibility, effective instructional leadership that requires universal (re) focus of all goals and roles on student learning, (f) effective instructional leadership requires direct participation in all levels by superintendents (g), the outcome of effective instructional leadership is student learning equity, and (h) a culture of instructional leadership that is requisite for minimizing student learning inequity. The findings demonstrate the value of collaborative and shared practices to support instructional leadership and student equity.

Graduation Semester

2025-12

Type of Resource

Thesis

Handle URL

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/132582

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2025 Jack Baldermann

Owning Collections