Strategic interactions in modern elections and markets
Deshpande, Sanyukta
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/132617
Description
Title
Strategic interactions in modern elections and markets
Author(s)
Deshpande, Sanyukta
Issue Date
2025-09-02
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Jacobson, Sheldon H.
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Jacobson, Sheldon H.
Committee Member(s)
Sreenivas, Ramavarapu S.
Wang, Qiong
Garg, Nikhil
Department of Study
Industrial&Enterprise Sys Eng
Discipline
Industrial Engineering
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Strategic Behavior
Mechanism Design
Fairness
Rank Choice Voting
Game Theory
Electoral Institutions
Abstract
This thesis examines strategic interactions in democratic and economic institutions against the backdrop of technological advancements which fuel new strategic capabilities. I investigate four interconnected domains: manipulation of redistricting fairness through strategic campaigning (termed here as 'Votemandering'), computational complexity and optimal strategies in Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), large-scale empirical validation of RCV's mechanism design, and AI-driven strategic behavior in oligopolistic markets. My overarching aim is to identify strategic gaps and guide institutional design in technology-mediated environments, which I do by developing theoretical and algorithmic frameworks through computational modeling, optimization techniques, as well as comprehensive empirical analysis.
The findings contribute toward strengthening mechanism design in both electoral and market contexts. In redistricting, I demonstrate that fairness measures can exhibit vulnerability to strategic voter-data manipulation, though efficient regulatory frameworks and non-partisan constraints can enhance robustness. For RCV, I develop efficient algorithms that circumvent computational complexity barriers to uncover its strategic incentives. A large-scale analysis of over 100 diverse real-world elections shows that despite theoretical vulnerabilities, actual strategic dynamics are straightforward and transparent, and allow significant improvements in democratic benefits over prior plurality elections. In market contexts, I find that large language models demonstrate sophisticated strategic capabilities but exhibit autonomous, tacit collusion, sustaining prices up to 200\% of competitive levels. However, targeted regulation of major firms can effectively restore competitive pricing. Together, these contributions provide computational frameworks for understanding technology-mediated strategic behavior while offering practical tools for preserving institutional integrity in democratic governance and competitive markets.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.