Beyond the imitation game: complementary intelligence partnerships in education
Galla, Michele K.
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/132660
Description
Title
Beyond the imitation game: complementary intelligence partnerships in education
Author(s)
Galla, Michele K.
Issue Date
2025-11-26
Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)
Magee, Liam
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Magee, Liam
Committee Member(s)
Cope, William
Kalantzis, Mary
Ortega-Martin, José Luis
Department of Study
Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp
Discipline
Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ed.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Anthropocentrism
AI
Noetic Intelligence
Abstract
This dissertation examines a paradox that challenges core assumptions about intelligence in education: the “Bloom’s Taxonomy Inversion,” where Large Language Models excel at “higher-order” synthesis while failing at “lower-order” factual recall. I trace this anomaly to AI’s anthropocentric foundations, from Turing’s imitation framing through the Dartmouth agenda, showing how human-centric benchmarks, while providing early focus and legitimacy, ultimately constrained architectural development and educational applications. As institutions rush to integrate AI without adequate frameworks, these theoretical gaps produce problematic practices: treating AI as either threats to replace human intelligence or as deficient tools requiring perfection of human-like performance.
I argue that anthropocentrism has created a paradigm mismatch. Educational theory developed for individual human learners proves inadequate for human-AI collaboration, leaving educators without guidance for effective cognitive partnerships. I propose a paradigm shift to Complementary Intelligence, introducing Noetic Intelligence (NI) to describe machine-native cognitive capabilities distinct from human cognition. Rather than pursuing AI that imitates humans, the framework positions NI as a partner with asymmetric but complementary strengths.
My research contributes in three ways. First, it offers theoretical advancement through the Complementary Intelligence framework, which grounds human-NI collaboration in architectural difference rather than deficiency. Second, it provides practical resources through the “Beyond the Imitation Game (BIG) Research Handbook,” a pedagogical guide featuring the Dual-Track Complementary Cognition Taxonomy and assessment tools for evaluating collaborative intelligence. Third, it employs a dual-perspective methodology, treating NI systems as research participants through structured interviews with eleven architecturally diverse systems and comparing human versus noetic coding of responses. This approach produces a framework refined through collaboration rather than human theorizing alone.
The research generates concrete educational applications: pedagogies that strategically distribute cognitive labor according to architectural strengths, assessments evaluating collaborative quality and learning growth rather than individual outputs, and curricula developing “intelligence awareness” as a foundational 21st-century literacy. By repositioning the human-NI relationship from imitation to complementarity, this work provides educators with theoretically grounded and actionable frameworks for teaching in an era of multiple intelligences.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
