Relative efficacy of an ergonomic data entry system as measured by speed, accuracy, and perceived system protocol complexity by end users
Thomalla, Anthony Alan
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/22445
Description
Title
Relative efficacy of an ergonomic data entry system as measured by speed, accuracy, and perceived system protocol complexity by end users
Author(s)
Thomalla, Anthony Alan
Issue Date
1991
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Zaccaria, Joseph S.
Department of Study
Education
Discipline
Education
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Business Administration, General
Health Sciences, Occupational Health and Safety
Psychology, Industrial
Environmental Sciences
Computer Science
Language
eng
Abstract
This study explored the relative efficacy of Enterview as measured by speed, accuracy, and perceived complexity. Enterview was contrasted with Lotus 123. The effect of methods of data entry and acquisition were investigated. These were the independent variables. Speed, accuracy, and perceived complexity were dependent variables. A review of the literature explored the history of data entry conflicts and describes the development of Enterview.
"Initial 1-tests displayed overall significant effects in the methods of entry and acquisition. These results, however, were assumed to be governed by ""step effect"". The source of a significant effect detected by a two-way MANOVA was explored by ANOVA procedures."
It was concluded that: (a) the method of entry has no effect on speed; (b) the method of entry has a significant effect on accuracy; (c) the method of entry has no effect on perceived complexity; (d) the method of acquisition has no effect on speed; (e) the method of acquisition has no effect on accuracy; (f) the method of acquisition has no effect on perceived complexity; (g) the interaction between methods has no effect on speed; (h) the interaction has no effect on accuracy; and (i) the interaction has no effect on perceived complexity.
Conclusions suggest that (a) data entry tasks performed with Enterview are more accurate than with Lotus 123; (b) Enterview is sometimes more convenient to use for data entry routines; and (c) end users perceive the complexity of Enterview and Lotus 123 as equal.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.