A Study of Energy Tax and Rebate Schemes: Energy Conservation and the Question of Equity
Fazel Sarjui, Farzaneh
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/70443
Description
Title
A Study of Energy Tax and Rebate Schemes: Energy Conservation and the Question of Equity
Author(s)
Fazel Sarjui, Farzaneh
Issue Date
1983
Department of Study
Business Administration
Discipline
Business Administration
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Business Administration, General
Abstract
Taxing all kinds of primary energy at the well-head on a $/BTU basis is suggested. This aims at inducing energy conservation throughout the economic system. To reduce the financial pressure of the tax on consumers, especially the poor, tax revenues could be rebated to households. It has been attempted to design an "equitable" rebate scheme.
A mathematical model has been developed which approximates the reduction in a household's total energy consumption in response to higher energy prices and different rebate schemes. This model is based on the assumption that energy consumption is a function of a household's real income, prices of different commodities and energy intensities.
The amount of energy saved and the change in real expenditure of a household has been calculated for four tax rates; 50%, 100%, 224% and 400%, and five rebate schemes; one regressive, two progressive, one income distribution preserving and the flat per capita rebate. The results indicate that, for a given tax rate, the choice of rebate scheme does not significantly affect the amount of energy conserved by the households. However, the effect of different rebate schemes on a household's real expenditure could be dramatically different.
The change in real expenditure of a household for "income distribution preserving" rebate is less than the other rebate schemes. A regression analysis indicates that the amount of rebate paid to a household based on this scheme heavily depends on the household's real expenditure before tax, family size and degree of urbanization of the place of residence of the household.
The change in energy consumption of other final demand sectors and the energy conserved throughout the economy have also been approximated. There has been an actual reduction of 13.84% in the amount of energy consumed per GNP dollar between 1972-73 and 1980. This study "predicts" that reduction to be about 13%.
The case of tax and rebate has been compared with a hypothetical decontrol of natural gas in terms of their effects on energy consumption and real expenditure of a household. It is concluded that, from an "equity" standpoint, the tax and income distribution preserving rebate would be preferred to decontrol of natural gas as a means of conserving energy.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.