Tragedy With a Vengeance: Violence, Vengeance and Identity From Attic Tragedy to Shakespeare
Dodson-Robinson, Eric Andrew
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/72571
Description
Title
Tragedy With a Vengeance: Violence, Vengeance and Identity From Attic Tragedy to Shakespeare
Author(s)
Dodson-Robinson, Eric Andrew
Issue Date
2009
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Blake, Nancy
Department of Study
Comparative and World Literature
Discipline
Comparative and World Literature
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Literature, Classical
Literature, Comparative
Theater
Literature, English
Abstract
This project explores the relation between violence and identity along one branch of the Western tragic tradition---from its roots in the soil of classical Attica, through Senecan tragedy, and into early modern drama in English. Classical and early modern tragedy is seductive in its sophisticated, savage portrayals of the relations between violence and who we are as human beings. In this study I explore these relations from a perspective that is both diachronic and psychoanalytic. My central argument is that throughout this tradition, violence defines identity.
My study engages with two important controversies: one is the question of the Western dramatic tradition: does such a tradition exist? If so, what are its continuities and discontinuities? The second is the validity of psychoanalytic readings of classical and early modern works and culture. I repeatedly argue against previous psychoanalytic readings of early modern and classical tragedy, but my approach throughout this work does more than dispute established interpretations of specific plays: what I challenge here is the psychoanalytic methodology of reading tragedy in terms of intrasubjective conflicts and logic: that is of reading the action on stage as an exclusively internal conflict between reason and passion or id and ego.
Lacanian theory was essential to this project, but equally essential was a determination to explore the tragedies comparatively and on their own terms in light of the vast cultural, dramaturgical, and axiological differences between Athens of the fifth-century BCE, Seneca's Rome, and Elizabethan London. Accordingly, questions of reception, tradition, and 'influence' are implicit in this study, the central object of which is the relation between violence and the construction of the self. Throughout this work I emphasize questions about violence and hereditary identity; the relation between violence, agency, and the divine order; the repetition of violence and retribution, and the roles of the other and of the social order in violence.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
