Catching the mind's eye: the effect of internal distraction on external attention

Windsor, Matthew

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/72874 Copy

Description

Title

Catching the mind's eye: the effect of internal distraction on external attention

Author(s)

Windsor, Matthew

Issue Date

2015-01-21

Director of Research (if dissertation) or Advisor (if thesis)

Simons, Daniel

Doctoral Committee Chair(s)

Simons, Daniel

Committee Member(s)

• Beck, Diane
• Federmeier, Kara
• Hummel, John E.
• Lleras, Alejandro

Department of Study

Psychology

Discipline

Psychology

Degree Granting Institution

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Degree Name

Ph.D.

Degree Level

Dissertation

Keyword(s)

• attention
• visual attention
• taboo words
• internal attention
• emotion
• semantic incongruity
• humor
• attention capture
• dual-task
• auditory attention
• speech processing
• jokes

Abstract

Most studies of human attention focus on how individuals are able to allocate their attention to various perceptual sources in the environment. Yet, the internal processing of information, such as holding or manipulating information in working memory, speech comprehension, and long-term memory retrieval, are also attentionally demanding. If attention is to be conceptualized as a general pool of resources that gives processing priority to some sources over others, then both stimuli in the external and internal environments must both draw from this pool. Furthermore, if some externally sourced stimuli are able to capture attention due to their potential behavioral relevance, then the processing of significant internal information may be able to capture attention as well. The ability for speech to impact attention, specifically the processing of incongruous or highly meaningful speech, was investigated in a series of six experiments. Experiment 1 examined how one-liner jokes, a stimulus with affective qualities as well as the need to manipulate information, could impact performance on an unrelated visual attention task. Experiments 2 and 3 looked at how being presented with a semantically inconsistent word in a stream of non-sentential, category-consistent words could affect visual attention task performance. Experiments 4, 5, and 6 assessed the impact of hearing taboo words on visual task performance. Experiment 1 opened the door to the possibility of speech processing related visual attention disruption, with individuals showing reduced performance in a visual task when concurrently processing the punch-line of a joke. Experiments 2 and 3 revealed no visual task disruption as a result of hearing non-sentential, semantically incongruent information, and actually trended toward showing a slight performance boost when hearing category-inconsistent words. Auditory presentation of taboo words in Experiments 4, 5, and 6 was consistently able to disrupt performance on an unrelated visual attention task, delaying responses to visual targets when presented immediately following taboo words. As a whole, the current data suggest that when attention is split between the internal processing of auditory information and an external visual task, surprising or meaningful auditory information can impact visual attention and that the effects vary as a function of the nature of the surprising information.

Graduation Semester

2014-12

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/72874

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2014 Matthew Windsor

Owning Collections