The Effects of Pitch, Vowel, Dynamic Level, and Gender on Nasalance in Amateur and Classically Trained Singers
Jennings, Jori Johnson
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/85752
Description
Title
The Effects of Pitch, Vowel, Dynamic Level, and Gender on Nasalance in Amateur and Classically Trained Singers
Author(s)
Jennings, Jori Johnson
Issue Date
2005
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
David Kuehn
Department of Study
Music
Discipline
Music
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
A.Mus.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Health Sciences, Speech Pathology
Language
eng
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to ascertain the effects of frequency range, vowel, dynamic level, and gender in amateur and classically-trained singers. Nasalance scores were obtained for 21 amateur singers and 25 classically-trained singers while singing an ascending 5-tone scalar passage in low, mid, and high ranges at both piano and mezzo-forte dynamic levels on each of the five cardinal vowels (/a/,/e/,/i/,/o/,/u/). A repeated mixed-model analysis indicated a significant main effect for the amateur/classically-trained distinction, dynamic level, and vowel, but not for range or gender. The amateur singers had significantly higher nasalance scores than classically trained singers on all vowels except /o/ when collapsed for all three ranges. The amateur singers also had significantly higher nasalance in each of the three ranges when scores for all vowels were combined for each range. Dynamic level had a significant effect on nasalance for the female subjects. For both amateur and classically-trained females, there was a significant difference between passages sung piano versus those sung forte. In the low and mid ranges, nasalance scores for female subjects were significantly higher in the passages sung piano. In the high range for female subjects, mezzo-forte passages received higher nasalance scores. In addition to vocal training and dynamic level, vowel had a significant effect on nasalance scores overall. For all subjects combined, /i/ received significantly higher nasalance scores when collapsed over all three ranges than all of the other vowels. The vowels /a/ and /e/ were not significantly different from each other, but were both significantly higher than /o/ or /u/. No significant difference existed between /o/ and /u/. Although results of this study show that certain variables in classical singing, such as vowel, range, and dynamic level, have a significant effect on nasality, it is important to note that only six of the subjects, all of whom were amateur singers, had average nasalance scores that could be considered hypernasal (i.e., a nasalance average above 22). This finding and the fact that classically trained singers consistently had less nasalance than amateur singers suggest that nasality does not play a prominent role in classical Western singing.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
